27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table I - Micromotion results at the tip of the stem categorized by loading side (dorsal,<br />

lateral, volar and medial) and load applied in each side (mean ± SD).<br />

Micromotion at tip [µm]<br />

DORSAL LATERAL VOLAR MEDIAL<br />

20N 50.2 ± 1.31 4.4 ± 0.12 25.2 ± 1.18 5.2 ± 0.25<br />

40N 79.5 ± 1.06 9.2 ± 2.76 45.2 ± 0.66 7.5 ± 0.24<br />

80N 130.3 ± 1.64 37.4 ± 0.20 58.1 ± 0.40 12.5 ± 0.19<br />

5. DISCUSSION<br />

In this study, micromotion of the Re-Motion radial component due to three levels of<br />

applied edge loading (20, 40 and 80N) for four orientations (dorsal, lateral, volar and<br />

medial) were calculated. The results demonstrated micromotion that was significantly<br />

higher when loads were applied in the sagittal plane. Also demonstrated was that<br />

micromotion was significantly related to the load applied.<br />

Previous studies have indicated micromotion less than 40 µm could result in<br />

osseointegration while micromotion of 150 µm had resulted in a interposition of a<br />

fibrous tissue layer at the stem–bone interface 12,13 . In general, studies reported that<br />

physiological loads giving rise to implant-bone relative micro-movements of the order<br />

of 100 or 200 µm may inhibit bone in-growth eventually promoting loosening of the<br />

implant 14-17 .<br />

Measured values of the radial component of the Re-Motion for this individual trial were<br />

below this threshold. Further biomechanical testing including multiple samples would<br />

be necessary to document the initial fixation this implant. This preliminary data is<br />

being utilized to validate an analytical model for the purpose to study variations in<br />

loading, bone geometry and bone quality.<br />

This study has three main limitations. As mentioned one limitation is that this represents<br />

only one sample. Second, these results were obtained from a radius from an elderly<br />

donor. Bone quality can affect stability for press fit cementless implants. Third, further<br />

refinement of the experimental method based on this pilot could improve the accuracy<br />

and .reliability of the measurements.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

Biomechanics and Motion Analysis Laboratory at Mayo Clinic for welcoming and<br />

supporting the researcher Susana Meireles.<br />

Fundacão para a Ciência e a Tecnologia for funding Susana Meireles through Grant<br />

SFRH/BD/45320/2008.<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

1. Cobb T.K. and Beckenbaugh R.D., Biaxial long-stemmed multipronged distal<br />

components for revision/bone deficit total-wrist arthroplasty, J. Hand Surg., 1996,<br />

21A(5), 764–70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!