27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

End<br />

i<br />

joint angles and length offsets yi ∈ [ θ j, lj]<br />

for each x i . [iv] Compute y i , σ y and<br />

Λ<br />

i<br />

y for output variables.<br />

Compute and plot the statistical uncertainty ellipse ( ek : χ = 5.99 for 95%<br />

x and y ∈ [ θ , l ] .<br />

confidence level) of the distribution of i<br />

7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

i j j<br />

The phalangeal joint parameters, extracted by implementing the concept of planar<br />

homography for palmer grasp (Fig. 5) for two healthy adult Indian males, have been<br />

reported in Tables 1, 2 and 3. The localization uncertainty ranges from varies from 1-4<br />

pixels (Table-1) with the associated error ellipse in Fig. 5. The primary source of<br />

localization error ( x ± 3σ ) is partial cross occlusion due to thumb flexion above the<br />

curled fingers at point R where the user has difficulty in selecting point R in Case-2,<br />

evident from associated error ellipse. The maximum uncertainty of estimated joint<br />

_<br />

(a) Case-1 (b) Case-2<br />

Fig. 5 Extracted angles and joint offsets along with error ellipses (a) Palmer view. (b) Lateral View.<br />

angles ( θ ± 3σ<br />

) is ±4.5° (at 95% confidence level) reported in Table-2 with joint limits<br />

[5]. Direct measurement of actual joint angles due dynamic formation of palmer grasp<br />

being unfeasible in this case , the validation has been done by retrieving the right angled<br />

grid in the reference plane which is with in 0.1% - 0.5% error. The uncertainty in<br />

estimation of joint offsets ( li ± 3σ<br />

) has been reported in Table-3, along with actual<br />

directly measured data ( lm ± 3σ<br />

). Maximum estimated uncertainty is ±2.0 mm but the<br />

uncertainty in direct measurement is ±4.0 mm. This is because size of palmer grasps<br />

change with grasping force and varies during repeated grasping by an individual.<br />

Table-1 : Uncertainty in point localization. (pixel)<br />

Selected Points → A C E G I K L N P R T<br />

Case-1<br />

x ± 3σ 178.6<br />

±3.91<br />

169.6<br />

±2.36<br />

200.1<br />

±2.12<br />

173.4<br />

±2.01<br />

214.4<br />

±4.37<br />

152.5<br />

±2.70<br />

171.5<br />

±3.15<br />

42.36<br />

±0.75<br />

56.01<br />

±0.51<br />

55.24<br />

±1.65<br />

84.58<br />

±1.11<br />

y ± 3σ 77.56<br />

±1.67<br />

159.2<br />

±1.33<br />

144.1<br />

±1.94<br />

193.5<br />

±1.13<br />

163.8<br />

±0.95<br />

161.5<br />

±1.89<br />

174.1<br />

±1.5<br />

82.6<br />

±0.84<br />

188.0<br />

±0.72<br />

151.5<br />

±2.4<br />

169.6<br />

±1.34<br />

x ± 3σ 214.4<br />

±0.46<br />

203.6<br />

±0.39<br />

233.9<br />

±0.34<br />

203.1<br />

±0.57<br />

244.4<br />

±0.46<br />

171.8<br />

±0.46<br />

184.5<br />

±0.52<br />

221.0<br />

±0.81<br />

253.5<br />

±0.81<br />

256.7<br />

±10.94 269.4<br />

Case-2<br />

±0.75<br />

y ± 3σ 80.7<br />

±0.51<br />

151.0<br />

±0.25<br />

149.2<br />

±0.72<br />

185.3<br />

±0.63<br />

169.7<br />

±0.47<br />

150.5<br />

±0.61<br />

170.8<br />

±0.78<br />

81.7<br />

±0.86<br />

175.3<br />

±0.86<br />

142.4<br />

±13.91 155.6<br />

±1.17<br />

Y<br />

Z<br />

X

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!