27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a) b)<br />

c) d)<br />

Figure 7 Validation: a) D=2mm, load=0.19N µd=0.9; b) D=2mm, load=0.5N µd=0.7; c) D=5mm, load=0.19N µd=1.1; d) D=5mm,<br />

load=0.5N µd=0.8<br />

6. SUMMARY<br />

In the previous work the skin friction and deformation behaviour has been measured in-plane and perpendicular to sliding<br />

direction during in vivo reciprocating sliding of a smooth steel ball probe against human forearm skin (M. Kwiatkowska et<br />

al., 2009). In this work FE was used for the simulation of the deformation behaviour of the forearm skin. The numerical<br />

model was used to assess the usefulness of FE to simulate deformation behaviour in-plane and perpendicular to sliding<br />

direction during reciprocating sliding of a ball probe against human forearm skin. Simulations were made for two different<br />

diameters of ball and two loads. During the simulation the position of a reference point was tracked in the horizontal and<br />

vertical direction. The results of the simulations are in rather good agreement with the experimental results published by<br />

Kwiatkowska et al. Differences between the test results and FE modelling results are on an acceptable level. The main<br />

explanation for the differences is the fact that a 2D model has been used and a constant friction coefficient. The mechanical<br />

properties used were taken from literature and modified to suit (S. Diridollou et al., 2001) (M. Kwiatkowska et al., 2009)<br />

(Geerligs, 2009) (F.M. Hendriks, 2005) (F. M. Hendriks, 2003) (Bensouilah J., 2006) (Hung A., 2009).<br />

During the simulation an average dynamic friction coefficient was used for each probe. In these simulations, the skin is<br />

compressed in front of the probe, forming a “bow-wave” and stretched behind as a consequence of friction and lateral surface<br />

displacement. The same effect is noticed in the experimental study.<br />

A 3D FE model should give better results because it describes better the 3D geometry of the spherical probe. The<br />

experimental part should be improved by Digital Image Correlation (DIC). The DIC can be used to control many reference<br />

points, which is important for validation of the FEM model.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

Bensouilah J. B. P. Aromatherapy in the treatment and care of common skin conditions [Journal] // Paperback.. - 2006.<br />

Boyer G. [et al.] Dynamic indentation on human skin skin in vivo: ageng effect [Journal] // Skin Research and<br />

Tecchnology. - 2009. - Vol. 15. - pp. 55-67.<br />

C. Pailler-Mattéi H. Zahouani, Analysis of adhesive behaviour of human skin in vivo by an indentation test [Journal] //<br />

Tribology International. - 2006. - pp. 12-21.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!