27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 1 Snapshots of self-assembly process of<br />

DNA on mica surface: (a) t=1×10 -4 s, (b)<br />

1×10 -3 s, (c) 1×10 -2 s and (d) AFM image.<br />

characteristic time is determined as 1.0×10 -5 s with respect to the characteristic length<br />

and diffusion coefficients. The non-dimensional forms of Eqs. (1) and (2) can be<br />

obtained by using these quantities.<br />

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Figure 1 shows computational results and the atomic force microscope (AFM) images<br />

of self-assembled structure of 50bp poly(dA)poly(dT) DNA fragments on mica and<br />

HOPG surfaces. Bright regions present higher density of adsorbed molecules. The time<br />

evolution of u shows the distribution in the self-assembled structure formation. The<br />

density is distributed randomly at t 0 s, and the difference in the density becomes<br />

clearer as time passes. In this case, F u, v<br />

and G u, v<br />

are given by<br />

Fu, v<br />

au bv<br />

c , (3)<br />

Gu, v<br />

eu f , (4)<br />

where a , b , c , e and f are parameters which are summarized in Table 1. The surface<br />

8<br />

is divided into 100 100 grids and x y<br />

1.<br />

010<br />

m. The parameter, c and f are<br />

the source terms. The characteristics of these patterns strongly depend on the difference<br />

of constraints for F and G . For the case of mica surface, the condition is set to<br />

0 F Pu<br />

and v P G 0 , where u P and P v denote upper limits for interactions with<br />

external systems as controlled by the source terms. On the other hand, for the case of<br />

HOPG, the conditions of u P F and v P G are maintained. At the equilibrium<br />

2<br />

conditions, t 110<br />

s, computational results are in qualitative agreement with<br />

experimental ones. Differences between network patterns on mica and HOPG surfaces<br />

can be represented precisely. The length of both the vertical and the horizontal sides is<br />

1.0 μm and the order of length corresponds to the experimental scale.<br />

Table 1 Parameters for the reaction-diffusion wave model in the non-dimensional units.<br />

<br />

D u<br />

Fig. 2 Snapshots of self-assembly process of<br />

DNA on HOPG surface: (a) t=1×10 -4 s, (b)<br />

1×10 -3 s, (c) 1×10 -2 s and (d) AFM image.<br />

<br />

x<br />

<br />

y<br />

<br />

t<br />

0.60 0.60 0.10 0.01 0.50 0.20 0.50<br />

<br />

a<br />

<br />

b<br />

<br />

c<br />

<br />

d<br />

<br />

e<br />

<br />

f<br />

<br />

g<br />

0.08 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.06 0.15 0.03<br />

<br />

D v<br />

<br />

P u<br />

<br />

P v

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!