27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the 1 st and 2 nd cases. The layer is a result of the advanced osseointegration therefore this<br />

process definitely improves the implant/bone interaction. Mechanical interaction<br />

influences the physiological conditions for remodeling and the results show that from<br />

this point of view the bone of higher BVF is more suitable.<br />

5. CONCLUSION<br />

In this paper an advanced computational model of the dental implant interaction with<br />

bone tissue was introduced. This model was created including three dimensional<br />

complex trabeculae architecture. This attitude is not commonly used and it can be<br />

considered as the best direction in future analyses. The models introduced in this paper<br />

should be regarded as preliminary because in reality bone remodeling occurs during the<br />

normal use of the implant and therefore a change of topology of trabeculae as well as of<br />

the cortical bone. Nevertheless, the results show that from the physiological point of<br />

view the best conditions for remodeling are given by the bone with higher bone density.<br />

Achieving a good osseointegration in a poor quality bone is very difficult (among others<br />

since it is difficult to ensure the primary stability of the implant). For this reason it is<br />

still highly required to perform bone quality examination before a dental implant<br />

application, and also to provide a sufficiently long period of healing.<br />

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This work was supported by grant specific research FSI-J-11-3/942 and education and<br />

Continuing Involment of Talented Individuals to Research Centers of AS CR and FME<br />

BUT; CZ.1.07/2.3.00/09.0228.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

1. Misch, C. E., Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Hardbound, 2007.<br />

2. Albrektsson T., Brånemark, P. I., Hannsson, H. A., Lindström, J. Osseointegrated<br />

titanium implants. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica., 1981, Vol. 52, 155-170.<br />

3. Borák, L., Marcián, P., Florian, Z., Bartáková, S., Biomechanical study of disk<br />

implants, Engineering Mechanics, 2010, Vol. 17, 1-12.<br />

4. Marcián, P., L. Borák, Z. Florian, S. Bartáková, O. Konečný, P. Navrátil,<br />

Biomechanical study of the bone tissue with dental implants interaction. Applied<br />

and Computational Mechanics, 2011, Vol. 5, 173-186.<br />

5. Frost, H. M. Bone’s mechanostat: a 2003 update. The Anatomical Record Part: A<br />

Dis. in Mol., Cell., and Evol. Biology, 2003, Vol. 275, 1081–1101.<br />

6. Marcián, P., Konečný, O., Borák, L., Valášek, J., Řehák, K., Krpalek, D., Florian, Z.<br />

On the Level of Computational Models in Biomechanics Depending on Gained Data<br />

from Ct/Mri and Micro- Ct. MENDEL conference, 2011, p 255-267.<br />

7. Konečný, O., Marcián, P., Borák, L., Valášek, J., Krpalek, D., Florian, Z. STL<br />

Model Creator – Software, Jan. 2010. URL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!