27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

simulations. Implicit in this setup is the assumption of the equivalence of<br />

macrostructural (tissue) constitutive response and average stress-strain response of the<br />

microstructural (cellular) model. While single cell computational models have provided<br />

invaluable insight into the chondrocyte mechanical environment, human cartilage,<br />

especially at early stages of development and for certain zonal regions, can exhibit<br />

much higher cell concentrations than previously assumed [3]. The predictions of<br />

chondrocyte mechanics as obtained from single cell assumption may not be adequate for<br />

cartilage with high chondrocyte density, due to misrepresentation of macroscopic load<br />

transfer to the cells and the potential to overlook cellular interactions. We have<br />

previously shown, albeit with hyperelastic two- and three-dimensional representations,<br />

the potential mismatches in such variables for increasing strain level and cell density,<br />

specifically for zero, one, and three cell representations [7,8]. Hence, the goal of this<br />

study was to compare the mechanical response of chondrocytes in single and eleven [3]<br />

cell biphasic finite element (FE) models. To guarantee spatial and temporal mechanical<br />

consistency across scales, an embedded model was adopted, where the representative<br />

volume element (RVE) was directly modeled within a homogeneous ECM construct.<br />

Volume averaged effective cellular strains and fluid flux were evaluated as a function of<br />

time and loading.<br />

3. METHODS<br />

A 100x100x100 μm, the commonly assumed representative volume element (RVE),<br />

micro-scale finite element model was embedded in a 1x1x1 mm (tissue-scale)<br />

hexahedral mesh construct (Figure 1). All models were meshed with linear hexahedral<br />

elements using TrueGrid (XYZ Scientific Applications, Inc., Livermore, CA).<br />

For the RVE, two cases were considered: a single (centered) cell and an eleven cell<br />

(randomly distributed, anatomically based for middle zone of cartilage [3])<br />

Figure 1. 1x1x1 mm finite element mesh construct with the embedded 100 um<br />

representative volume element (RVE) micro-scale models. Close-ups of the (b)<br />

single cell and (c) eleven cell model are highlighted. Note the spheres in subplots “b”<br />

and “c” represent the chondron (chondrocyte plus the pericellular matrix).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!