27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. ABSTRACT<br />

DIGITAL ULTRASOUND DESPECKLING FOR AUTOMATIC<br />

SEGMENTATION<br />

Ali S. Saad 1 ,<br />

Noise is the main factor which hampers the visual quality of ultrasound images. The<br />

noise in such images is called "speckle" can be modeled as a random multiplicative<br />

process. Computerized speckle reduction techniques are applied to digital ultrasound<br />

images in order to reduce the noise level and improve the automated segmentation<br />

process. Several results prove that wavelet filtering perform the best for speckle<br />

reduction in digital ultrasound images. Other results on x-ray images compared wavelet<br />

filtering with multi-scale contrast enhancement prove that the last one performs better.<br />

The purpose of this study is to compare the two filtering approaches for speckle<br />

reduction on digital ultrasound images as preprocessing step before applying<br />

unsupervised segmentation.<br />

The first method uses the wavelet soft threshold (WST) approach for speckle reduction.<br />

The second method is based on multi-scale contrast enhancement. This approach is<br />

constructed from the combination of a smoothing and derivative of the image. Contrast<br />

enhancement is applied on local scale by using varying size of median filter.<br />

The two methods were applied to synthetic and real ultrasound images. A comparison<br />

between WST and multi-scale contrast enhancement method was also carried out.<br />

Application of these methods to the ultrasonic images proved that there was a<br />

significant improvement of the visual quality of the ultrasound images and more<br />

accurate precision of the automated and unsupervised segmentation of real ultrasound<br />

images.<br />

The comparison confirmed that WST filtering gives better results than the other one as<br />

preprocessing process for unsupervised segmentation of ultrasound images.<br />

1 Associate Professor, Dept. of Biomedical Technology, College of applied medical sciences, King Saud<br />

<strong>University</strong> P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Emails: alisaad@ksu.edu.sa<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!