27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

edding them up to the half into a resin (Technovit 4004, Heraeus Kulzer GmbH & Co.<br />

KG, Germany). The specimens were positioned on the holder 30° from its long axis<br />

(Figure 2).<br />

As a next step implant displacements and rotations were measured using the selfdeveloped<br />

biomechanical hexapod measurement system (HexMeS) which is composed<br />

basically of three components: A Hexapod high precision robot (PI M-850.50, Physik<br />

Instrumente, Karlsruhe, Germany) to apply forces and torques to a dental specimen, a<br />

high precision 3D force/torque transducer (ATI FTSGamma 130/10, Schunk Spann-<br />

und Greiftechnik, Lauffen/Neckar, Germany) for force and torque measurement and an<br />

optical system for position registration, consisting of an aluminium cube, equipped with<br />

three pin-holes (diameter of the holes: 2µm, Melles-Griot, Bensheim, Germany) and<br />

back-illuminated with a laser (35 mW, 658 nm, Laser 2000, Wessling, Germany), and<br />

three video-cameras with macro-zoom optics (JAI CV-M1, Stemmer-Imaging, Puchheim,<br />

Germany). All components are connected via a computer network and controlled<br />

by a self-developed software. The experiments were run as follows: Specimens were<br />

equipped with the laser cube and mounted in the setup, the Hexapod was positioned<br />

such that a tip was in contact with the abutment (Figure 3), and by moving the tip,<br />

forces, and/or torques were applied to the specimens. Resulting displacements were registered<br />

by measuring the movement of the laser illuminated pin-holes with the video<br />

cameras. The total distance for the hexapod’s movement was given to be 0.5 mm.<br />

Figure 2: Specimen embedded in the resin in 30° from the holder<br />

long axis.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

4.1 Numerical Results<br />

30°<br />

Figure 3: Measurement set-up: Specimen<br />

mounted on the holder and loaded by moving<br />

the hexapod 0.5 mm downward perpendicular<br />

to the specimen.<br />

Maximum displacements of the implants were related to the geometry. Most of the mini<br />

implants showed deflections at the assumed position of the crown (point of force application)<br />

of 258 to 400 µm, except for the Komet MicroPlant (2.5x15 mm) which showed<br />

the lowest displacement (125 µm). However, the highest displacement of 799 µm was<br />

observed with the K.S.I.-Bauer Schraube implants (3.0x18.5 mm, Figure 4).<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!