27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A BIOREATOR TO BIOMECHANICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL<br />

CHARACTERIZATION OF ENGINEERED CARTILAGE<br />

1. ABSTRACT<br />

A. Completo 1 , J. Pereira 1 , C. Relvas 1 , A. Ramos 1 , J. Simoes 1 ,<br />

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease characterized by pain and disability. Severe<br />

osteoarthritis is the prime cause for joint replacement surgery [1]. The substitution of<br />

tissues with allograft materials includes the risk of infections or a graft rejection [2].<br />

Artificial implants have limitations and insufficient bonding to the bone. New therapy<br />

concepts for practical medical applications are required. To this end, tissue engineered<br />

substitutes generated in vitro could open new strategies for the restoration of damaged<br />

tissues. Many of the tissues for which one may desire to engineer a replacement have a<br />

biomechanical function. However, the mechanical properties of many tissues<br />

engineered to date are inferior to those of native tissues [2], a finding that clearly<br />

highlights two important key issues in biomechanics. The first is related to the relevance<br />

of the mechanical properties of the engineered tissues to their function in-vivo. The<br />

second, assuming that the mechanical properties will be important, concerns the control<br />

of these properties. Some investigators had concluded that the mechanical properties of<br />

artificial cartilage can be improved by appropriate mechanical stimulation [2]. These<br />

indications are promising, but the properties of these engineered cartilages remain<br />

inferior of native [1]. Much more investigation is required in what concerns new devices<br />

for tissue culture namely the bioreactors in order to identify the types of required<br />

stimulation to improve the mechanical properties of engineered cartilage tissue [2].<br />

Together with biomechanical characterization, bioreactors could thus help in defining<br />

when engineered tissues have a sufficient mechanical integrity and biological<br />

responsiveness to be implanted [2]. Large part of the actually bioreactors cannot<br />

accommodate the differentiated mechanical stimulations and don’t allow following in<br />

real time its biomechanical and biochemists properties [1]. In order to answer at the<br />

limitations of the actual bioreactors concepts a new bioreactor concept was developed.<br />

2. METHODS<br />

The general functions of the bioreactor (Figure 1) are the control and delivery accurate<br />

and reproducible compression, tension, shear, bending and/or electric and/or magnetic<br />

stimulation patterns, and the generation of a biochemical environment suitable for<br />

growth and differentiation. In order to achieve this aim, the first design principle is high<br />

versatile both of the actuator and culture chamber, so the device can be used with 3D<br />

cell constructs or 2D cell constructs. Deriving from these general design criteria, the<br />

most constraint and requirements are: Cytocompatibility of the materials in contact with<br />

culture mean, Easy sterilization and sterility maintenance, Easy of use, Can be used in a<br />

standard incubator, Comparative biomechanical and biochemical characterization<br />

between mechanical stimuled and static cell constructs without interrupt cell culture and<br />

1 Biomechanics Research Group, Mechanical Engineering Department, <strong>University</strong> of Aveiro, Campus de<br />

Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!