27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. METHODS<br />

3.1 Experimental Method<br />

The T13-L1 disc was dissected from a skeletally mature (aged 3-5 years) ovine spine<br />

that had been wrapped in plastic filmand stored at -20˚C until use. A block of AF tissue<br />

was taken from the anterior portion of the disc and mounted in a freezing sledging<br />

microtome with the radial face of the tissue block facing the microtome blade. Slices<br />

60µm thick were cut at 30˚ to the axis in plane with the one direction of the fibres and<br />

transected the alternating direction of fibres as previously described as “in-plane” 4,5 .<br />

The slices were floated in a bath of saline at 5˚C and tested within 2 hours of extraction<br />

from the disc.<br />

The slices were individually placed into a bespoke tensile testing rig previously<br />

described in detail 6 , with the radial ends securely clamped. The slices were sandwiched<br />

between two glass cover slips that allowed light to be transmitted through the specimen.<br />

The rig was mounted directly into the rotating stage of a conventional light microscope<br />

(Nikon Multizoom AZ100). The slices were incrementally strained in the radial<br />

direction. An image of the strained tissue was captured with every 0.5mm of extension<br />

until the specimen failed.<br />

3.2 Computational Methods<br />

The prior-to-loading and loaded images of one of the slices was selected for the FE<br />

analysis. A portion was chosen that showed three lamellae: two in which the fibres were<br />

in-plane and one with cross sectioned fibres (Figure 2a). Proprietary software (ScanIP,<br />

version 4, Simpleware Limited, Exeter, U.K.) was used to develop a 2D model from the<br />

preload image, specific to the specimen’s geometry captured in the micrograph. The inplane<br />

and sectioned lamellae were segmented as separate components. Additional<br />

features, such as the interlamellar bridging elements were also included in the models.<br />

The model was exported to a commercially available FEA software package (ABAQUS<br />

CAE 6.9-1, Simulia Corp, Providence, RI, USA). The model contained approximately<br />

30,000 2D-plane stress elements. This will henceforth be referred to as the “FE model”.<br />

Adjacent lamellae were assigned opposite material orientations to account for their<br />

differing fibre orientations. Previously derived orthotropic material properties for the<br />

AF 7 were assigned to the lamellae (Table 1). The ratios of the material properties in<br />

the x, y and z directions were maintained, however the material properties were not<br />

assigned units. No experimental loading data was acquired, hence only the relative<br />

material properties of the constituent tissues were investigated, rather than their absolute<br />

values.<br />

Ex Ey Ez νxy νxz νyz Gall directions<br />

0.0004 0.07 0.016 0.023 0.075 1.38 0.0001<br />

Table 1 – Unit-less orthogonal material properties applied to the lamellar, based on previous material model<br />

development 7 . Shear modulus (G) is assumed to be the same in all directions.<br />

The process of creating a model based on a single microscopy image was repeated for<br />

the loaded image. This will henceforth be referred to as the “experimental model”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!