27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Error in position [mm]<br />

Error in position [mm]<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

RASIS<br />

0 0.2 0.4<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

LASIS<br />

0 0.2<br />

Time [s]<br />

0.4<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

RPSIS<br />

0 0.2 0.4<br />

LPSIS<br />

0 0.2<br />

Time [s]<br />

0.4<br />

Error in position [mm]<br />

Error in position [mm]<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

LFE<br />

1<br />

0 0.2 0.4<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

MFE<br />

1<br />

0 0.2<br />

Time [s]<br />

0.4<br />

Figure 2. Error in position (distance) relative to the underlying bone marker. (*) symbols represent<br />

the original skin landmarks while the continuous line represents the proposed procedure. The figure<br />

on the left is for pelvis landmarks while the other on the right is for those of the femur.<br />

The previous procedure was repeated for 5 different simulation repetitions of different<br />

random sinusoidal function phase angles. Results are shown in Table 1.<br />

Rep.<br />

No.<br />

Pelvis landmarks<br />

Rigid model Skin<br />

RASIS RPSIS LASIS LPSIS RASIS RPSIS LASIS LPSIS<br />

Femur landmarks<br />

Rigid model Skin<br />

LFE MFE LFE MFE<br />

1 28.5 33.0 30.1 30.5 38.6 39.5 40.2 40.2 26.8 39.7 43.4 43.2<br />

2 27.2 29.2 26.9 28.0 35.7 37.9 36.6 36.3 42.5 41.5 43.7 42.1<br />

3 25.0 26.0 23.0 23.3 37.5 39.1 37.0 39.4 39.1 40.4 43.7 43.7<br />

4 28.2 13.8 28.3 14.2 37.0 40.2 38.0 37.5 25.3 38.0 43.2 44.5<br />

5 27.0 24.9 25.2 22.0 38.7 36.7 36.2 35.9 26.5 35.8 44.9 41.8<br />

Table (1). Errors in landmark positions before and after implementing the proposed rigid body<br />

model for different 5 repetitions.<br />

As can be seen in Table 1, a significant reduction the errors in the positions of pelvis<br />

landmarks has been obtained after implementing the proposed procedure for all the<br />

repetitions. A similar procedure was followed for the femur, and the results are depicted in<br />

Fig. 2 and Table 1.<br />

5. CONCLUSION<br />

A recent study shows that conventional methods for obtaining rigid body kinematics from<br />

landmark trajectories based on an optimization process may not reduce the STA. In this<br />

article we have introduced a method for the calculation of rigid body kinematics for the<br />

lower extremity. Starting from the angular velocity and acceleration of the body, the<br />

orientation of a local reference system attached to the body, represented by three<br />

consecutive rotations around fixed axes, is integrated after adequate transformation. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!