27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stiffness of PCL to be compensated [13] (3) it can be processed into fibers using<br />

common plastic extruders [8].<br />

2.2 Dedicated FE code<br />

Details of the code used in this study have been previously reported [10]. Briefly, the<br />

approach aims at reproducing the nonlinear behavior of textile materials by simulating<br />

the relative motions between fibers, individually modeled by an enriched kinematical<br />

beam model accounting for cross-sectional strains within a large deformation<br />

framework. The non-linear stress-strain response of isolated PLCL fibers is<br />

approximated by a elastoplastic constitutive law consisting in a linear elastic part<br />

followed by a Chaboche-type hardening, whose parameters have been determined by<br />

using the least squares method from tensile tests on P(LL85/CL15) fibers for a given<br />

tensile speed. The process of contact detection consists in (1) the determination of<br />

proximity zones where contacts are likely to occur within the global assembly of beams<br />

(2) the creation of intermediate geometries defined as the average of fibers axes (3) the<br />

generation of contact elements at discrete locations on these intermediate geometries by<br />

using planes orthogonal to these geometries. The contact-friction interactions are then<br />

modeled in the form of a regularized penalty law in the normal direction and a<br />

Coulomb's law for tangential friction. As far as the definition of boundary conditions<br />

are concerned, rigid bodies attached to both ends of each layer of the multilayer braid<br />

are used to prescribe loads or displacements to each layer, while isolated fibers bound to<br />

these rigid bodies by means on average conditions are allowed to rearrange. As the<br />

initial configuration of the scaffold can not be known a priori, we start from an arbitrary<br />

configuration where trajectories of fibers are described by helices and where fibers are<br />

therefore interpenetrated within the same layer (Fig. 1). This interpenetration is<br />

gradually reduced by means of contact conditions starting from the braiding pattern of<br />

the construct. As a result of this non linear iterative process, a non-interpenetrated<br />

configuration of the braid is obtained as the equilibrium configuration of the assembly<br />

of fibers which satisfies the braiding pattern of the scaffold. Once this first initial<br />

configuration has been computed, a series of boundary conditions which aims at<br />

reproducing the braiding tension needed to tighten fibers during the braiding process<br />

and the pre-tension applied before the scaffold testing is prescribed. The tensile –and/or<br />

torsion- test is then simulated by prescribing an increasing displacement –and/or<br />

rotation- to one edge of each layer of the scaffold.<br />

2.3 Determination of a suited scaffold configuration<br />

The effects of three process parameters, namely the fiber diameter, the braiding angle<br />

and the number of layers of the braid, on the tensile response were assessed. The<br />

number of fibers per layer has been fixed to 16. In a previous work [8], the effect of<br />

these parameters on the pore size distribution has been reported. The determination of a<br />

suited scaffold configuration has been based on both morphological and mechanical<br />

criteria, considering that the scaffold should: (1) offer a minimum pore size of 200-<br />

250µm [9] (2) bear strains more than 4% often encountered during rehabilitation<br />

exercises [11] (3) offer a stiffness around 120N/mm reported for native ACL [14].<br />

Indeed, as the external loading of ACL is displacement-controlled rather than forcecontrolled<br />

and its physiological function is to restrain the relative displacement between<br />

femur and tibia, it has been considered that the mechanical requirements should be<br />

considered in terms of minimal strain to rupture and stiffness rather than in terms of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!