27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An algorithm was written (Matlab, R2009a, MathWorks, Natick, USA) to extract the<br />

coordinates of the nodes along the outer edges of the FE and experimental models.<br />

Interpolation was used to find nodes in the two models with the most similar y values.<br />

The coordinates of these similar nodes were compared and the difference was found<br />

between their x values. This difference was applied as a displacement boundary<br />

condition to the node in the FE model. This process was repeated for each node along<br />

the outer edges of the model in the radial direction. Thus in its deformed state, the FE<br />

model had the same geometry along its outer edges as the experimental model. A<br />

variable displacement was applied to the outer edges of the model that ensured the<br />

deformation of the model was the same as that observed experimentally.<br />

Two variations of the FE model were developed: the “bridges” model and the “sheath”<br />

model. This allowed a comparison of the two tissue models postulated in the<br />

literature 1,5 . Details from these two model variations are shown in Figure 1: in the<br />

bridge model, bridges join the two in-plane lamellae. In the sheath model, the bridges<br />

are part of a sheath network that surrounds the fibre bundles. A fine layer of sheath<br />

elements is included inbetween the sectioned and in-plane lamellae.<br />

Figure 1 - Detail of FE models showing bridge variation (left) and sheath variation (right).<br />

For both models, the relative material properties of the bridges/sheaths were varied.<br />

The stiffness was considered relative to that of the lamellae in the x direction. The<br />

bridge/sheath elements were assigned isotropic linear elastic material properties. The<br />

stiffness was varied by orders of ten, from one order of magnitude lower than the<br />

lamellae in the x direction (Elam,x:Ebridge = 1:0.1) to five orders of magnitude higher<br />

(Elam, x:Ebridge = 1:100,000). The internal geometry of the deformed FE model was<br />

compared to that of the experimental model.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

In plane lamellae<br />

4.1 Experimental Results<br />

Sectioned lamella<br />

Cross bridges<br />

Cross bridges integrated<br />

into sheath network<br />

surrounding fibre bundles<br />

During the testing of the five specimens, common characteristic features were observed,<br />

such as puckering of interlamellar boundaries and the thinning of tissue in localised<br />

areas, as highlighted in Figure 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!