27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IS 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF NANOINDENTATION<br />

NECESSARY TO INVESTIGATE POST-YIELD MECHANICS OF<br />

BONE?<br />

1. ABSTRACT<br />

V. R. Toal 1 and C. J. Adam 2<br />

Nanoindentation is used to probe the micromechanical properties of bone. Finite<br />

Element Analysis (FEA) of nanoindentation can extend the conventional mechanical<br />

property output to develop constitutive models of bone’s post-yield behaviour. It has<br />

been shown that load-displacement curves are almost equivalent for two-dimensional<br />

(2D) axisymmetric and three-dimensional (3D) FEA models, but the same cannot<br />

necessarily be said for 2D versus 3D simulations of pile-up surrounding the indent.<br />

Furthermore, it has been suggested that friction between the indenter and bone, often<br />

assumed negligible, may be an important consideration for nanoindentation simulations.<br />

Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare the pile-up predicted by 2D<br />

axisymmetric and 3D models of bone nanoindentation using the three-sided pyramidal<br />

Berkovich tip, including the role of friction.<br />

Two series of FE analyses were performed using solid continuum 2D axisymmetric and<br />

3D hexahedral elements on bone block meshes, refined at the point of indenter contact.<br />

The equivalent conical angle of 70.3° was used for the axisymmetric model, while the<br />

3D model consisted of one sixth of the indenter with half angle of 65.35°. Both models<br />

included a tip radius of 150 nm and an elastic-perfectly plastic material model with von<br />

Mises yield surface (E = 13.56 GPa, υ = 0.3, σyield = 301 MPa) to simulate a<br />

displacement-controlled indentation to 2.55 µm. The frictional coefficient between<br />

indenter and bone was varied between 0.0 and 0.3.<br />

The resulting load-displacement curves varied little between the axisymmetric and 3D<br />

models, consistent with existing literature. However, the 3D model pile-up height was<br />

up to 40% greater than the axisymmetric model. These results suggest that<br />

characterising bone plasticity through FE modelling of nanoindentation may require a<br />

three-dimensional approach.<br />

2. INTRODUCTION<br />

Physiological and abnormal mechanical loading of the skeleton can lead to the<br />

formation of microdamage, tiny cracks within the bone tissue [1]. This is the physical<br />

manifestation of post-yield loading of bone tissue and has been implicated as a<br />

contributing factor to bone fragility [2]. Nanoindentation of bone has become a popular<br />

approach in recent years to probe the micromechanical properties of the tissue, the scale<br />

1 PhD Candidate. 2 Associate Professor. School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering,<br />

Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland <strong>University</strong> of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane,<br />

Queensland 4000, Australia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!