27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

model, strain patterns varied across the transverse cross-section as well as in depth.<br />

Another explant specific surface curvature model was created using the same protocol<br />

and analysed. It was found that the stress and strain patterns predicted are indeed highly<br />

dependent and sensitive to the surface curvature of the explants (Figure 6). Furthermore,<br />

small surface adulations were found to cause significant shear stress patterns inside the<br />

tissue (Figure 6).<br />

Figure 6 Contour plot of deformation predicted for another explant specific surface curvature model.<br />

Strain pattern differs from previous model. Maximum deformation was 1.953mm indicated in red. (left)<br />

Contour plot of significant shear stresses observed in another explant specific surface curvature model,<br />

compared to the homogenous shear stress on the magnitude of 1e -4 MPa in the flat surface mode.<br />

Maximum shear stress was 0.147MPa indicated in red and the minimum was -0.238MPa indicated in<br />

blue. (right)<br />

6. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The results from this study show that modelling of the exact surface geometry of the<br />

explants is essential for accurate prediction of the magnitude and distribution of stress<br />

and strains experienced inside the tissue during mechanical loading. A protocol has<br />

been set up for creating finite element models with explant specific surface curvature.<br />

The method uses dental putty to record the surface geometry of the condyles, thereby<br />

eradicating the need for direct contact measurement techniques and reducing damage,<br />

contamination and time delay for the gene expression studies to be carried out.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

1. Chan P.S., Schlueter A.E., Coussens P.M., Rosa G.J.M., Haut R.C. and Orth M.W.,<br />

Gene expression profile of mechanically impacted bovine articular cartilage<br />

explants, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2005, Vol. 23., 1146-1151<br />

2. Thomas R.S., Clarke A.R., Duance V.C. and Blain E.J., Effects of Wnt3A and<br />

mechanical load on cartilage chondrocyte homeostasis, Arthritis Research and<br />

Therapy, 2011, Vol 3., R203<br />

3. Fitzgerald J.B., Jin M., Dean D., Wood D.J., Zheng M.H. and Grodzinsky A.J.,<br />

Mechanical compression of cartilage explants induces multiple time-dependent gene<br />

expression patterns and involves intracellular calcium and cyclic AMP, The Journal<br />

of Biological Chemistry, 2004, Vol. 279, Issue 19(7), 19502-19511<br />

4. Donzelli P.S., Spilker R.L., Ateshian G.A. and Mow V.C., Contact analysis of<br />

biphasic transversly isotropic cartilage layers and correlations with tissue failure,<br />

Journal of Biomechanics, 1999, Vol. 32, 1037-1047<br />

5. DiSilvestro M.R., Zhu Q., Wong M., Jurvelin J.S., Suh J.F., Biphasic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!