ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

6. REFERENCES
1. Tissakht, M., Ahmed A.M. and Chan K. C., Calculated Stress-Shielding in the
Distal Femur after Total Knee Replacement Corresponds to the Reported Location
of Bone Loss, J. Orthop. Res., 1996, Vol. 14, 778-85.
2. Barink, M., Verdonschot N. et al. A different fixation of the femoral component in
total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock, Proceedings
Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal Of Engineering In
Medicine, 2003, 217(5): 325-332.
3. Completo, A., Simões J. A. and Fonseca F., Revision total knee arthroplasty: The
influence of femoral stems in load sharing and stability, The Knee, 2009, Vol. 16(4),
275-9.
4. van Lenthe, G. H., Willems M. M. M., Verdonschot N., de Waal Malefijt M. C. and
Huiskes R., Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and
fixation on bone loss, Acta. Ortho. Scanda., 2002, Vol. 73(6), 630-7.
5. Bougherara, H., Zdero R., Mahboob Z., Dubov A., Shah S., Schemitsch E. H., The
Biomechanics of a Validated Finite Element Model of Stress Shielding in a Novel
Hybrid Total Knee Replacement, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2010, Vol. 224(10), 1209-
19.
6. Speirs, A. D., Heller M. O., Duda G. N., Taylor W. R., Physiologically based
boundary conditions in finite element modelling, J. Biomech., 2007, (40), 2318-23.
7. Phillips, A. T. M., The femur as a musculo-skeletal construct: A free boundary
condition modelling approach, Med. Eng & Phys., 2009, Vol. 31(6), 673-80.
8. Phillips, A. T., Pankaj P., Howie C. R., et al, Finite element modelling of the pelvis:
inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions., Med. Eng & Phys.,
2007, Vol 29, Pages:739-748, ISSN:1350-4533
9. Duda, G. N., Heller M., Albinger J., Schulz O., Schneider E., Claes L., Influence of
muscle forces on femoral strain distribution, Journal of Biomechanics. 1998, Vol.
31(9), 841-6.
10. B.E.L Repository. Bel repository 2008 [cited; Available from:
http://www.biomedtown.org/biomed_town/LHDL/Reception/datarepository/reposit
ories/BEL/repository/wh_view
11. Dunham, C. E., Takaki S. E., Johnson J. A., Dunning C.E., Mechanical properties of
cancellous bone of the distal humerus, Clinical Biomechanics, 2005, Vol. 20(8),
834-8.
12. Reilly, D. T., Burstein A. H., The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone, J. Bone
Joint Surg [Am], 1974, 1001-22.
13. Bergmann G. In-vivo forces from telemetry. 2008 [cited; Available from:
www.orthoload.com.
14. Klein Horsman, M. D., Koopman H. F. J. M., van der Helm F. C. T., Prosé L. P.,
Veeger H. E. J., Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal
modelling of the lower extremity, Clinical Biomechanics, 2007, Vol. 22(2), 239-47.
15. Brand, R. A., Crowninshield R. D., Wittstock C. E., Pedersen D. R., Clark C. R.,
van Krieken F.M., A Model of Lower Extremity Muscular Anatomy, Journal of
Biomechanical Engineering, 1982, Vol. 104(4), 304-10.