27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. MATERIALS & METHODS<br />

FE-models of human cadaver femurs were developed based on qCT scans of the<br />

specimens. Three previously established density-elasticity relationships (Eqs. (i)-(iii))<br />

were retrieved from the literature and were implemented in the FE-models (4, 9, 10).<br />

The accuracy of the FE-models in predicting the bones’ mechanical response to load<br />

was validated by biomechanical experiments. 23 human femur specimens, harvested<br />

fresh, were obtained from 14 donors (mean age ± standard deviation 61.5 ± 9.6 years,<br />

range 48 to 90 years, nine pairs, five single specimens, 10 male, 4 female). QCT-scans<br />

were conducted with 1.0 mm slice thickness and a pixel size of 0.547 or 0.488 mm<br />

respectively. The specimens were scanned in air with a mineral density calibration<br />

phantom to determine the relation between Houndsfield units (HU) and radiological<br />

density (ρQCT) in gK2HPO4/cm³.<br />

Quasi-static axial compression tests up to 1000 N with<br />

elastic deformation of the specimens were conducted on<br />

the 23 human cadaver femurs to determine strains, local<br />

displacements, and the axial bone stiffness for validation<br />

purposes. The specimens were mounted in a testing<br />

setup that was free of any constraining forces or<br />

moments and allowed a physiological bending of the<br />

femur (Fig. 1) (11). 17 specimens were supplied with<br />

five uniaxial strain gauges (SGs) and six specimens<br />

were supplied with eight SGs. The SGs were distributed<br />

over the lateral and the medial side of the femoral shaft,<br />

and the superior and the inferior side of the femoral<br />

neck, respectively. The axes of the SGs were aligned<br />

with the femoral neck axis or the femoral shaft axis,<br />

respectively, to measure compressive or tensile strains<br />

during axial compression.<br />

Optical markers were glued to the bone surface to<br />

measure local displacements. Eight to 14 optical<br />

markers per specimen were distributed over the frontal<br />

plane of the bones (Fig. 1). Further optical markers were<br />

applied to the proximal adapter of the testing machine<br />

and the frontal part of the cardan joint (Fig. 1). An<br />

Fig. 1 Mechanical test setup for<br />

axial compression test of femur<br />

specimen.<br />

optical measurement system tracked the markers and calculated coordinates and<br />

displacements using stereo-image based evaluation techniques.<br />

Subject-specific FE-models were generated based on the qCT-scans of the 23 human<br />

femurs. The FE-models were developed in four steps: (1) The CT data was segmented<br />

to obtain a 3D reconstruction of the bone surface. The reconstructed CT data was then<br />

converted into a solid model of the bone specimen. (2) The solid model was spatially<br />

registered and processed to match the boundary conditions with the experimental setup.<br />

(3) The solid model was meshed with finite elements and the boundary conditions were<br />

applied. (4) The material properties were mapped onto the FE mesh and the solution<br />

was obtained. Finally, the computational models were verified by mesh-convergence<br />

analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!