27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for Mtwo is explained by the high dispersion found in the experimental results and the<br />

fact that after 40° of rotation the instrument already starts to undergo plastic<br />

deformation. Thus, the simulated results after this point are not reliable as discussed<br />

previously.<br />

6. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The flexibility and torsional strength of ProTaper F1 and Mtwo rotary instruments were<br />

assessed by finite element analyses and compared to experimental results following the<br />

specification ISO 3630-1. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that the<br />

geometric differences between the two types of instruments defined the higher<br />

flexibility of the Mtwo instrument. Nevertheless, for the same reason, the torsional<br />

strength of the Mtwo instrument was lower than the F1 strength. The comparison<br />

among the simulated results and experimental ones reached a good accordance, with the<br />

both approaches indicating the same mechanical behavior of the instruments, meaning<br />

that this finite element model can be employed to study the endodontic instruments.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

1. Walia H. M., Brantley W. A., Gerstein H., An initial investigation of the bending<br />

and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files, J. Endod., 1988, Vol. 14, 346–<br />

51.<br />

2. Câmara A. S., Martins R. C., Viana A. S. D, Leonardo R. T., Buono V. T. L.,<br />

Bahia, M. G. A., Flexibility and torsional strength of ProTaper and ProTaper<br />

Universal rotary instruments assessed by mechanical tests, J. Endod., 2009, Vol. 35,<br />

113-6.<br />

3. Sattapan B., Palamara J. E., Messer H. H., Torque during canal instrumentation<br />

using rotary nickel-titanium files, J. Endod., 2000, Vol. 26, 156–60.<br />

4. Pruett J. P., Clement D. J., Carnes D. L. Jr., Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium<br />

endodontic instruments, J. Endod., 1997, Vol. 23, 77– 85.<br />

5. Bahia M. G. A, Buono V. T. L., Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickeltitanium<br />

rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals, Oral Surg. Oral<br />

Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 2005, Vol. 100, 249 –55.<br />

6. Bahia M. G. A., Martins R. C., Gonzalez B. M., Buono V. T. L., Physical and<br />

mechanical characterization and the influence of cyclic loading on the behaviour of<br />

nickel-titanium wires employed in the manufacture of rotary endodontic<br />

instruments, Int. Endod. J., 2005, Vol. 38, 795– 801.<br />

7. Bahia M. G. A., Melo M. C. C, Buono V. T. L., Influence of simulated clinical use<br />

on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments, Oral<br />

Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 2006, Vol. 101, 675– 80.<br />

8. Necchi S., Taschieri S., Petrini L., Migliavacca F., Mechanical behaviour of nickeltitanium<br />

rotary instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study,<br />

Int. Endod. J., 2008, Vol. 41, 939-49.<br />

9. Xu X., Zheng Y., Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six<br />

models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections, J.<br />

Endod., 2006, Vol. 32, 372–5.<br />

10. International Organization for Standardization ISO 3630-1. Dental root-canal<br />

instruments- Part 1: files, reamers, barbed broaches, rasps, paste carriers, explorers<br />

and cotton broaches. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization,<br />

1992.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!