27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecause muscles can not produce compressive force. Limitation of an activation level is<br />

next inequality constraints were .<br />

After calculation of muscular and TMJ forces during mastication, the same forces were<br />

calculated, but with missing out the muscles which are usually during implantation<br />

removed (masseter and temporalis).<br />

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Chewing force (Figure 1) was measured only in one place, the most loaded tooth, on<br />

specimen bolus side even if in real situations the mandibles are contacting in multiple<br />

points. Has been examined, that chewing forces in both left-right and anterior-posterior<br />

directions are not insignificant.<br />

Figure 1 Experimentally collected chewing force on balance side.<br />

The calculated TM joint forces are higher or with the similar values on the specimen<br />

balance side and with smaller values on the bolus side which is in conformity with [1].<br />

The calculated masseter muscle forces are higher on the bolus side, and temporalis<br />

muscle forces are higher on balance side as shown on Figure 2. Inertia and mass<br />

properties of mandible have not significant influence in results because the mandible<br />

accelerations during our investigation were very small. The TM joint forces were<br />

investigated with smaller values than was published [4,8]. In our experiment was<br />

masticated soft bolus (bread), probably from this reason these force are smaller than<br />

published.<br />

In case cut off masseter and temporalis muscles, the force ratio was changed on bolus<br />

and balance sides. First, if the cut off muscles are on balance side, the masseter muscle<br />

on bolus side has similar values as in case with muscles on both sides, but the<br />

temporalis muscle forces on bolus side increase, as shown on Figure 3.<br />

In case cut off muscles on bolus side, the masseter muscle force on balance side was<br />

with similar values as with muscles on both sides, but temporalis muscle force<br />

increases, as shown on Figure 4.<br />

Pterygoideus medialis muscle forces are in every cases increase more on side where the<br />

cut off masseter and temporalis muscle are, it means that pterygoideus adopt their role

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!