27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The growth laws for a day, adopted from Fickin et al., (2009), are applied to the<br />

reference or pre growth configuration where the growth occurs at the stress free state.<br />

The mechanical loading is then applied to the post growth configuration and this cycle<br />

repeats for number of days.<br />

Table 1 Parameters for hyperelastic stress constitutive equations of proteoglycans and collagens (Ficklin<br />

et al., 2009).<br />

<br />

(MPa)<br />

0.046<br />

<br />

2.02<br />

<br />

(MPa)<br />

0.11<br />

<br />

(MPa)<br />

0.53<br />

<br />

(MPa)<br />

0.53<br />

<br />

(MPa)<br />

0.27<br />

Table 2 Volume fractions and material constants, Ficklin et al., (2009)<br />

<br />

(MPa)<br />

0.53<br />

<br />

(deg)<br />

45<br />

<br />

(deg)<br />

45<br />

<br />

(deg)<br />

Volume fractions<br />

Permeability,<br />

, Metal implant<br />

/<br />

M<br />

Young’s<br />

, GPa<br />

modulus, Poisson<br />

ratio, <br />

0.886 0.064 0.014 0.036 2.46 10 8.88 35 0.3<br />

The Cauchy and second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors (denoted by and , respetively)<br />

are related by<br />

<br />

, 2 <br />

<br />

where , is scalar strain energy function, is right Cauchy-<br />

Green deformation tensor.<br />

The strain energy functions (Ficklin et al., 2009) are<br />

1 1<br />

6 <br />

1 1 1<br />

<br />

1 1 1 <br />

where ,,,,, represent the square of the stretch of the material<br />

line element, ,,, are material constants that represent bimodular terms as<br />

0 1 otherwise 0.<br />

4. IMPLEMENTATION IN COMSOL<br />

A simplified 2D axisymmetric representation of femoral cartilage of the human knee<br />

joint was reproduced from Wilson et al., (2003). The geometry was modified to include<br />

a defect sized (diameter 10 mm) metal implant (Fig. 2). The implant was placed slightly<br />

sunk (30% of cartilage thickness) into the cartilage with the surface of the implant<br />

perfectly matching the articulating surface. The hyperelastic constitutive equations for<br />

constituents (PG’s and COL) are implemented using solid mechanics module. The fluid<br />

flow equations are included through Darcy law module. These two physics are coupled<br />

manually through equations. The models were solved with and without considering the<br />

defect sized implant.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!