28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 th International Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

29. Compar<strong>in</strong>g environmental impacts of wild-caught and farmed fish products - a review of life cycle<br />

assessments<br />

E.A. Groen * , T.C. Vi<strong>et</strong>s, E.A.M. Bokkers, I.J.M. De Boer .............................................................................................................................................697<br />

30. Environmental consequences of gen<strong>et</strong>ic improvement by selective breed<strong>in</strong>g: a gilthead sea bream aquaculture<br />

case study<br />

Joël Aub<strong>in</strong> 1,2,* , Ivone Acosta Alba 1,2 , Pierrick Haffray 3 , Jérôme Bugeon 4 , Marc Vandeputte 5,6 ..................................................................................699<br />

31. Environmental assessment of trout production <strong>in</strong> <strong>France</strong>: <strong>in</strong>fluence of practices and production goals<br />

Joël Aub<strong>in</strong> 1,2,* , Elisab<strong>et</strong>h Samson 1,2,3 , Aurélien Tocqueville 4 .........................................................................................................................................700<br />

32. <strong>LCA</strong> of locally produced feeds for Peruvian aquaculture<br />

Angel Avadí 1,* , Pierre Fréon 2 , Jesús Núñez 3 , Camilo Cuba 4 ..........................................................................................................................................701<br />

33. A framework for susta<strong>in</strong>ability comparison of seafood supply cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Angel Avadí 1,* , Pierre Fréon 2 ............................................................................................................................................................................................703<br />

34. <strong>LCA</strong> of F<strong>in</strong>nish ra<strong>in</strong>bow trout, results and significance on different allocation m<strong>et</strong>hods<br />

Frans Silvenius 1,* , Juha Grönroos 2 , Hanna Hartika<strong>in</strong>en 1, , Sirpa Kurppa 1, , Markus Kanka<strong>in</strong>en 3 , Timo Mäk<strong>in</strong>en 3 , Raija Tahvonen 1, , Jouni<br />

Vielma 3 ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................705<br />

35. Ma<strong>in</strong>stream<strong>in</strong>g Life Cycle Management <strong>in</strong> the seafood sector: us<strong>in</strong>g a sector based and regional approach <strong>in</strong><br />

Northern <strong>France</strong><br />

Cather<strong>in</strong>e Beut<strong>in</strong> 1,* , Jodie Bricout 2 , Naeem Adibi 2 , Christelle Demar<strong>et</strong>z 3 .....................................................................................................................707<br />

36. Life cycle assessment of <strong>in</strong>tegrated fish pond aquaculture of household farms <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa<br />

Thomas Efole Ewoukem 5,* , Joël Aub<strong>in</strong> 1,2 , Olivier Mikolasek 4 , Michael S. Corson 1,2 , Hayo van der Werf 1,2 , Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Ombredane 2,3 ................708<br />

37. Distribution of Norwegian fresh fish fill<strong>et</strong>s from an environmental and economic po<strong>in</strong>t of view<br />

Mie Vold * , Ole Jørgen Hanssen, Erik Svanes ..................................................................................................................................................................709<br />

38. System delimitation <strong>in</strong> life cycle assessment of aquaculture<br />

B<strong>in</strong>iam Samuel-Fitwi 1,2,* , Jan P. Schroeder 2 , Carsten Schulz 1,2 ......................................................................................................................................710<br />

GROUP 2, SESSION A: CARBON OR WATER FOOTPRINTS, SOIL, BIODIVERSITY<br />

39. The assessment of biodiversity with<strong>in</strong> UK farm<strong>in</strong>g systems us<strong>in</strong>g an extended <strong>LCA</strong> ecosystem approach<br />

Cather<strong>in</strong>e Keel<strong>in</strong>g, Rob Lillywhite * ..................................................................................................................................................................................711<br />

40. Proposal of a unified biodiversity impact assessment m<strong>et</strong>hod<br />

Jan P L<strong>in</strong>dner 1,* , Tabea Beck 2 , Sebastian Schwarz 3 , Ulrike Eberle 4 , Mart<strong>in</strong> Blumberg 5 ..............................................................................................712<br />

41. Display<strong>in</strong>g environmental footpr<strong>in</strong>ts of agricultural products: a “biodiversity” <strong>in</strong>dicator based on landscape<br />

features<br />

Anton<strong>in</strong> Vergez * , Mart<strong>in</strong> Bortzmeyer...............................................................................................................................................................................714<br />

42. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of the Chilean apple orchard system: study <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> southern hemisphere producer<br />

Alfredo Iriarte 1,2,* , Pablo Villalobos 3 , Pablo Yañez 3 , Carlos Huenchuleo 3 ....................................................................................................................716<br />

43. Assessment of carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t m<strong>et</strong>hodologies used to evaluate Mediterranean horticultural production <strong>in</strong><br />

standard multi-tunnel greenhouses<br />

Rubén Beltrán-Palafox 1 , Julia Martínez-Blanco 2,* , Joan Rieradevall 2,3 , Assumpció Antón 4,5 , Pere Muñoz 5 ..............................................................717<br />

44. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t and energy use of different options for greenhouse tomato production<br />

Joana Almeida 1,* , Wouter Achten 1,2 , Bruno Verbist 1 , Bart Muys 1,* ................................................................................................................................719<br />

45. Assessment of F<strong>in</strong>nish cultivation practices with carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t and energy <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

Aki-Heikki F<strong>in</strong>ér * , Tero Hirvi, Jaakko Laur<strong>in</strong>en, Pasi Lähd<strong>et</strong>ie ....................................................................................................................................721<br />

46. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of Irish milk production<br />

M<strong>in</strong>g-Jia Yan 1 , James Humphreys 2 , Nicholas M. Holden 1,* ...........................................................................................................................................722<br />

47. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of the Australian dairy <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Sven Lundie 1 , Jake McLaren 2,* , Neil van Buuren 3 , Sebastian Gollnow 1,2 , Andrew Moore 2 , Larisa Maya Altamira 2 , Daniel Thylmann 1 , Barbara<br />

Nebel 2 , Hazel v. Rowley 4 , Manfred Lenzen 5 , Karen Christie 6 , Torsten Rehl 1 , Sab<strong>in</strong>e Deiml<strong>in</strong>g 1 ..............................................................................723<br />

48. Contribution of packag<strong>in</strong>g to the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of canned tuna<br />

Ngamtip Poovarodom * , Chularat Ponnak, Natthaphon Manatphrom ............................................................................................................................725<br />

49. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of Canadian dairy products: national and regional assessments<br />

Xavier P. Vergé 1 , Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Maxime 2 , Raymond L. Desjard<strong>in</strong>s 3,* , Yves Arcand 4 , Devon Worth 3 ...........................................................................727<br />

50. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of Flemish livestock products<br />

Ellen Bracquené * , Valerie Vandermeulen, Marianne Fernagut ......................................................................................................................................729<br />

51. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of organic crop production <strong>in</strong> Sweden<br />

Christel Cederberg * , Magdalena Wallman, Maria Berglund, Jenny Gustavsson ..........................................................................................................731<br />

52. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es on <strong>in</strong>clusion of land use change emissions <strong>in</strong> carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>ts of food<br />

Hannele Pulkk<strong>in</strong>en * , Kristoffer Krogerus, Juha-Matti Katajajuuri.................................................................................................................................732<br />

53. A simplified tool for the estimation of N and P emissions due to the use of fertiliser <strong>in</strong> a <strong>LCA</strong> study<br />

Filippo Sessa 1,* , Massimo Mar<strong>in</strong>o 1 , Pierluigi Meriggi 2 , Matteo Ruggeri 3 , Michele Zerb<strong>in</strong>i 4 .......................................................................................733<br />

54. Soil and biogenic carbon account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t: potential and challenges<br />

Edouard Périé 1,2,3,* , Sarah J. McLaren 1,3 , Brent E. Clothier 2,3 .........................................................................................................................................734<br />

55. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>LCA</strong> to <strong>in</strong>form policy for biochar <strong>in</strong> New Zealand<br />

Ruy Anaya de la Rosa 1 , Sarah J. McLaren 1,2,* , Jim Jones 1 , Ralph Sims 1 .......................................................................................................................735<br />

56. Soil quality aspects <strong>in</strong> food <strong>LCA</strong><br />

Taija S<strong>in</strong>kko * , Merja Saar<strong>in</strong>en ..........................................................................................................................................................................................736<br />

xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!