28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KEYNOTE SESSION 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

with accurate and understandable <strong>in</strong>formation on relevant product characteristics, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g environmental<br />

performance.<br />

In the framework of the Round Table, Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 1 (WG1) has been develop<strong>in</strong>g a harmonised m<strong>et</strong>hodology<br />

called the Protocol for the Environment Assessment of <strong>Food</strong> and Dr<strong>in</strong>k Products (ENVIFOOD Protocol).<br />

The ENVIFOOD Protocol is <strong>in</strong>tended to provide common guidance for assess<strong>in</strong>g the environmental<br />

performance of food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products, hence overcom<strong>in</strong>g the difficulties associated with the current proliferation<br />

of standards and guidance documents on this subject.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> purpose of the ENVIFOOD Protocol is the development of a common framework that will <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the scientific reliability and consistency <strong>in</strong> studies <strong>in</strong>tended to support <strong>in</strong>formed choice. In particular,<br />

this will support environmental assessments conducted <strong>in</strong> the context of bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess as well as bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-consumer<br />

communication, and the identification of environmental improvement options.<br />

This paper provides an overview of the multi-stakeholder approach to develop the ENVIFOOD Protocol,<br />

an overview of the Protocol itself, and possible next steps.<br />

2. ENVIFOOD Protocol: a stepwise process <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a broad spectrum of stakeholders<br />

As a first step towards the ENVIFOOD Protocol, the European Commission Jo<strong>in</strong>t Research Centre (JRC)<br />

Institute for Environment and Susta<strong>in</strong>ability (IES) hosted a scientific workshop <strong>in</strong> 2010 aimed at arriv<strong>in</strong>g at a<br />

common understand<strong>in</strong>g of what is required for: reliable and robust environmental assessment of food and<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k product supply cha<strong>in</strong>s; current limitations; and how to move towards more straightforward/focused<br />

criteria/guidance/tools (Peacock <strong>et</strong> al., 2011).<br />

On this basis, and tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the Guid<strong>in</strong>g Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the Round Table (<strong>Food</strong> RT, 2010), WG1<br />

elaborated a Road Map for the development and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of the ENVIFOOD Protocol. Major tasks<br />

planned <strong>in</strong> the Road Map over the time period 2010-<strong>2012</strong> were: a d<strong>et</strong>ailed analysis of data gaps and of m<strong>et</strong>hodological<br />

issues; draft<strong>in</strong>g of the ENVIFOOD Protocol; public consultation; and revision of the draft Protocol.<br />

In order to validate the ENVIFOOD Protocol and facilitate its application, the follow<strong>in</strong>g additional steps<br />

were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Road Map: test<strong>in</strong>g and f<strong>in</strong>e-tun<strong>in</strong>g of the ENVIFOOD Protocol; and provision of product<br />

specific guidel<strong>in</strong>es, criteria, tools and datas<strong>et</strong>s. Tasks beyond the ENVIFOOD Protocol test<strong>in</strong>g and f<strong>in</strong><strong>et</strong>un<strong>in</strong>g<br />

are currently out of the WG1 mandate and thus subject to future discussion and agreement.<br />

As the goal of the ENVIFOOD Protocol was to be built on the exist<strong>in</strong>g science for the environmental assessment<br />

of food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products, rather than <strong>in</strong>vent<strong>in</strong>g a new m<strong>et</strong>hodology from scratch, the d<strong>et</strong>ailed<br />

analysis was focused on:<br />

Review of m<strong>et</strong>hodologies and guidance documents for the environmental assessment of food and<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k products;<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g datas<strong>et</strong>s related to food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products.<br />

As a first step for the d<strong>et</strong>ailed analysis, WG1 focussed on <strong>in</strong>ventory<strong>in</strong>g reference m<strong>et</strong>hodologies, guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

and assessments. The start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for this <strong>in</strong>ventory was a survey of exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ability issues worldwide. This <strong>in</strong>ventory was then complemented by: a literature search of both scientific<br />

databases (e.g. SCOPUS, Google Scholar and Web of Science) and proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

conferences on agri-food <strong>LCA</strong>; and a WG1 <strong>in</strong>ternal consultation. Exist<strong>in</strong>g and upcom<strong>in</strong>g life cycle-based<br />

technical standards and guidance documents were then grouped <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g classes:<br />

General m<strong>et</strong>hodologies (i.e. reference standards and general guidance documents on <strong>LCA</strong>; general<br />

life cycle-based standards and technical agreements on footpr<strong>in</strong>ts and environmental disclosures);<br />

Sectorial m<strong>et</strong>hodologies (i.e. sector-specific guidance documents and technical agreements on environmental<br />

assessment and environmental disclosures);<br />

Sub-sectorial m<strong>et</strong>hodologies (i.e. sub-sector-specific guidance documents and technical agreements<br />

on environmental assessment and footpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g; and sub-sectorial rules for product environmental<br />

declarations);<br />

Product-specific guidel<strong>in</strong>es (i.e. product category rules (PCR) for environmental declarations for<br />

food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products);<br />

Other m<strong>et</strong>hodological <strong>in</strong>puts (i.e. European Union (EU) laws giv<strong>in</strong>g guidance on certa<strong>in</strong> life cycle<br />

approaches; relevant life cycle-oriented assessments by <strong>in</strong>ternational authoritative bodies; any other<br />

m<strong>et</strong>hodology and guidel<strong>in</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>ked to food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products).<br />

In order to complement the overview <strong>in</strong> tabular form of carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t m<strong>et</strong>hodologies – study prepared<br />

for the European Commission’s Directorate General (DG) Environment (Ernst&Young and Quantis, 2010) –<br />

a new m<strong>et</strong>hodology overview was outl<strong>in</strong>ed by WG1 draft<strong>in</strong>g group (De Camillis <strong>et</strong> al., 2011a) scann<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!