28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 4C: CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

3. Results<br />

3.1. Ma<strong>in</strong> contributors for the environmental impact of out-of-season tomato <strong>in</strong> Ben<strong>in</strong><br />

Most of the variability (90%) observed b<strong>et</strong>ween <strong>in</strong>dividual fields was expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the 3 first dimensions<br />

of the PCA. In this space, the <strong>in</strong>dividual fields P38 is located near the <strong>in</strong>tersection of the dimension. By<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition from the PCA m<strong>et</strong>hod, this <strong>in</strong>dividual field can be considered representative fields for the environmental<br />

impacts of the population. For the follow<strong>in</strong>g analysis, P38 which had the smallest distance to the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> of the PCA map (d=1.98) is used to analyse the environmental impact of one hectare of out-of-season<br />

tomato grown <strong>in</strong> the region. The contribution analysis of P38 (Table 2) identified energy used for irrigation<br />

as the ma<strong>in</strong> contributor for 7 among 14 impact categories. Then Nitrogen reactive emissions were the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

contributor for 2 impact categories (TA and ME) and also contributed to 2 other categories (GWP and POF).<br />

Crop protection (<strong>in</strong>secticides and fungicides) showed high contribution for TET, FET and MD.<br />

Table 2. LCIA results and contribution analysis for P38 and ma<strong>in</strong> correlations b<strong>et</strong>ween environmental impacts<br />

and the first 3 dimensions of the PCA<br />

Impact categories P38 LCIA P38 contribution Correlation<br />

Global Warm<strong>in</strong>g Potential- GWP<br />

Ozone Depl<strong>et</strong>ion- OD<br />

1.17E+04 kg CO2 eq<br />

1.22E-03 kg CFC-11 eq<br />

Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (85%), N emissions (15%)<br />

Irrigation (Irr.) mach<strong>in</strong>ery (100%)<br />

Dim 1 (0.99)<br />

Dim 1 (0.96)<br />

Human Toxicity- HT 6.07E+06 kg 1,4-DB eq Irrigation mach<strong>in</strong>ery (100%) Dim 1 (0.94)<br />

Photo Oxidant Formation - POF 2.11E+01 kg NMVOC Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (95%), N emissions (5%) Dim 1 (0.97)<br />

Terrestrial Acidity- TA<br />

Freshwater Eutrophication- FE<br />

2.41E+02 kg SO2 eq<br />

9.54E-01 kg P eq<br />

N emissions (92%), Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (8%)<br />

P emissions (59%), Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (36%), Insecticides<br />

(4%)<br />

Dim 2 (0.81)<br />

Dim 3 (-0.83)<br />

Mar<strong>in</strong>e Eutrophication- ME 3.99E+01 kg N eq N emissions (99%), Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (1%) Dim 2 (0.85)<br />

Terrestrial Eco Toxicity- TET 1.97E+02 kg 1,4-DB eq Insecticides (98%), Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (2%) Dim 2 (0.90)<br />

Freshwater Eco Toxicity- FET 1.22E+02 kg 1,4-DB eq<br />

P emissions (51%), Insecticides (39%), Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery<br />

(10%)<br />

Dim 2 (0.92)<br />

Mar<strong>in</strong>e Eco Toxicity - MET 8.60E+02 kg 1,4-DB eq Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (99%), Insecticides (1%) Dim 1 (0.95)<br />

Agricultural<br />

ALO<br />

Land Occupation-<br />

1.57E+03 m 2 a Field Area (99%), Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (1%) -<br />

Water Depl<strong>et</strong>ion- WD 3.81E+03 m 3<br />

Irrigation water (100%) -<br />

M<strong>et</strong>al Depl<strong>et</strong>ion- MD 1.09E+02 kg Fe eq<br />

Irr. mach<strong>in</strong>ery (75%), Fungicides (24%), Insecticides<br />

(1%)<br />

-<br />

Fossil Depl<strong>et</strong>ion- FD 3.49E+03 kg oil eq Irrigation mach<strong>in</strong>ery (100%) Dim 1 (0.96)<br />

3.2. Correlations b<strong>et</strong>ween major impact categories and cropp<strong>in</strong>g system characteristics<br />

Table 2 presents the correlations b<strong>et</strong>ween the 3 first dimensions and the environmental categories, and<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween LCIA results and cropp<strong>in</strong>g system components for the field P38. Eleven out of 14 impacts categories<br />

were correlated to one of the three dimensions. These categories are of major concern for the variability<br />

of the environmental impact for the studied system.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce GWP, POF, FD, OD, MET and HT (see Table 2 for acronyms) were correlated to dimension 1, this<br />

dimension was a good synth<strong>et</strong>ic descriptor for the variability of the datas<strong>et</strong> (50%). All these impact categories<br />

were primarily affected by the energy used for irrigation. GWP and POF were secondarily affected by N<br />

emissions, while MET was affected by pesticides emissions. Dimension 2 represented 26% of the overall<br />

variability, and was ma<strong>in</strong>ly correlated to FET, TET, ME, and TA. ME and TA were ma<strong>in</strong>ly impacted by<br />

nitrogen emissions, while FET was impacted by both phosphorus emissions and <strong>in</strong>secticides. F<strong>in</strong>ally TET<br />

was ma<strong>in</strong>ly impacted by <strong>in</strong>secticides.<br />

The Kuiper’s test showed that the distribution of certa<strong>in</strong> additional variables was consistent with the dimensions<br />

of the PCA. Soil type is correlated to dimension one, with sandy soils show<strong>in</strong>g higher values (v-test<br />

=2.28) and silty soils show<strong>in</strong>g lower values than the population average (v-test =-1.97). The energy use for<br />

irrigation (through the number of pump<strong>in</strong>g hours) was also correlated to dimension 1, with manual systems<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g lower values than the population average (v-test =-2.05). Unexpectedly, the volume of water supplied<br />

did not correlate with this dimension suggest<strong>in</strong>g that a greater energy use for pump<strong>in</strong>g water did not<br />

necessarily result <strong>in</strong> a greater volume applied due to important discrepancies <strong>in</strong> the technologies’ efficiency.<br />

The geographical location (urban or peri-urban), was correlated to dimension 2 with the fields of Cotonou<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g greater values (v-test=2.13) than the overall population. The number of pesticides applications at<br />

the field stage and the number of fertiliser applications were also correlated to dimension 2. F<strong>in</strong>ally the rate<br />

of m<strong>in</strong>eral nitrogen was negatively correlated to dimension 3, highlight<strong>in</strong>g a dichotomy b<strong>et</strong>ween the impact<br />

415

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!