28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GROUP 5, SESSION B: FOOD PRODUCTS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

147. Influence of transport on environmental impacts of the<br />

production cha<strong>in</strong> of poultry <strong>in</strong> Brazil<br />

Sebastião Roberto Soares 1,* , Vamilson Prudêncio da Silva Junior 2 , Edivan Cherub<strong>in</strong>i 1 , Marco Antônio<br />

Santos 3<br />

1 Universidade Federal de Santa Catar<strong>in</strong>a, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2 Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão<br />

Rural de Santa Catar<strong>in</strong>a, 3 Eng. Agrônomo - Especialista em Gestão Ambiental Agro<strong>in</strong>dustrial, Correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

author. E-mail: soares@ens.ufsc.br<br />

Brazil is among the five largest exporters of poultry meat (Burnquist <strong>et</strong> al., 2011, USDA, 2011) solidify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as one of the majors exporter of livestock products, Brazilian’s production is benefited by favourable climatic<br />

conditions and its vast territory, besides the high government <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the sector. These production<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>s, such as poultry, pigs and cattle, <strong>in</strong> particular, are able to produce all raw materials that it’s used<br />

<strong>in</strong> animal feed. That feature br<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g advantages for Brazilian companies when evaluated the environmental<br />

impacts of its products s<strong>in</strong>ce livestock production is responsible for a major impact on the environment<br />

as noted by de Vries and de Boer (2010), so the choice for a more susta<strong>in</strong>able product can mitigate<br />

some of these impacts. Although the cha<strong>in</strong> can be self-sufficient <strong>in</strong> production of gra<strong>in</strong>s, the large distances<br />

of a cont<strong>in</strong>ental country b<strong>et</strong>ween the stages <strong>in</strong> the life cycle added to the lack of k<strong>in</strong>ds of transportations may<br />

eventually supplant that environmental ga<strong>in</strong>. Thus the aim of this paper is to evaluate from the environmental<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t of view, different k<strong>in</strong>ds of transportation and their <strong>in</strong>fluences on the productive cha<strong>in</strong> of frozen chicken<br />

for export. We evaluated two scenarios: (A) Poultry produced and exported <strong>in</strong> South with the gra<strong>in</strong>s com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from the Central West; and (B) Poultry and gra<strong>in</strong>s produced <strong>in</strong> Central West with the exportation placed <strong>in</strong><br />

South East. The functional unit is a ton of poultry delivered <strong>in</strong> the port for exportation. The m<strong>et</strong>hod used<br />

through the software SimaPro® was the CML 2000 with modifications, from where we choose by the easier<br />

level of communication with the stakeholders, the impact categories of global warm<strong>in</strong>g and total cumulative<br />

energy demand. The results of the <strong>LCA</strong> of the usual scenarios, <strong>in</strong>dicates South Poultry as that with the worse<br />

environmental performance, due the transportation of gra<strong>in</strong>s. For the category of global warm<strong>in</strong>g the difference<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween the South and the Central West, <strong>in</strong> tons of CO2 equivalent emitted, only from the transportation<br />

of gra<strong>in</strong>s and the f<strong>in</strong>al product are about 49.6%, with the possibility of this difference decrease 19%.<br />

References<br />

Burnquist, H. L., da Costa, C. C., de Souza, M. J. P., Fassarella, L. M., 2011. Composite Index of Mark<strong>et</strong><br />

Access for the Export of Poultry from Brazil. International Centre for Trade and Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development<br />

(ICTSD), Geneva, Switzerland.<br />

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2011. Livestock and Poultry: World Mark<strong>et</strong>s and Trade.<br />

Foreign Agricultural Service.<br />

de Vries, M., de Boer, I.J.M., 2010. Compar<strong>in</strong>g environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of<br />

life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128, 1-11.<br />

879

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!