28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 6A: TOOLS AND DATABASES 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

At the gtg level, other processes with significant energy use and significant byproduct formation are di<strong>et</strong>hanolam<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

<strong>et</strong>hylene, white phosphorus, chlor<strong>in</strong>e, and sodium hydroxide. In this rollup, chlor<strong>in</strong>e and sodium<br />

hydroxide are used <strong>in</strong> quantities similar to their production rates, and so, the impact of allocation<br />

choice is m<strong>in</strong>or. The <strong>et</strong>hylene and di<strong>et</strong>hanol am<strong>in</strong>e gtgs each produce products with similar utility and<br />

chemical properties. White phosphorus has a fairly small energy contribution, however, the allocation to<br />

lower value products is high. Thus, the phosphorus allocation may be important <strong>in</strong> the result.<br />

The total process energy is 88.1 MJ/kg glyphosate. Process energies are scaled to account for cradle to<br />

gate delivery of fuel and aga<strong>in</strong> scaled to account for energy generation efficiencies. The total high heat value<br />

(HHV) of fuels used ctg is 148 MJ/kg glyphosate. Us<strong>in</strong>g this presentation, it is very easy to apply alternative<br />

energy production models and update these data as energy supplies change.<br />

The process and natural resource energies for glyphosate production are summarized <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.<br />

In this view, energies for commodity chemicals are shown as ctg values. The energy profile dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

the glyphosate gtg, which uses 63 MJ of the total 88 MJ of process energy/kg glyphosate. We can learn<br />

more about the energy use, potential variability b<strong>et</strong>ween manufacturers, and potential for improvement by<br />

look<strong>in</strong>g more closely at the glyphosate gtg. The full glyphosate gtg report conta<strong>in</strong>s a d<strong>et</strong>ailed description of<br />

the process, a process flow diagram, and Tables d<strong>et</strong>ail<strong>in</strong>g mass and energy flows at the unit operation level.<br />

This document can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by contact<strong>in</strong>g the article authors. The glyphosate process takes place <strong>in</strong> a<br />

dilute aqueous solution, and about 80% of the energy use <strong>in</strong> the glyphosate gtg is for evaporation of the water.<br />

Based on most of the patent data (US 6,921,84; US 7,799,571; US 5,962,729; US 3,969,398), the water<br />

use ratio (kg water/kg PMIDA) was 10:1 to 50:1. In our gtg model, the water use was 36 kg/kg PMIDA.<br />

Evaporation of water is an energy <strong>in</strong>tensive process, and this energy can be reduced dramatically by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

multi-effect evaporators. These units split the evaporation <strong>in</strong>to multiple stages and utilise the steam from<br />

each stage as an energy supply for successive stages. An economic tradeoff b<strong>et</strong>ween capital cost and operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(energy) costs favours more evaporation steps <strong>in</strong> larger processes. In the glyphosate model, a s<strong>in</strong>gle effect<br />

evaporator was used. Thus some <strong>in</strong>dustrial plants may achieve significantly lower energy use by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reactor concentrations and us<strong>in</strong>g multiple effect evaporators.<br />

Feedstock use of fossil fuels can be seen <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1. Natural gas is used to make formaldehyde and ammonia,<br />

p<strong>et</strong>roleum is used to make <strong>et</strong>hylene oxide, and coal is used to make m<strong>et</strong>allurgical coke for phosphorus<br />

production. Us<strong>in</strong>g high heat values of 29 MJ/kg for coal, 54 MJ/kg for gas, and 45 MJ/kg for oil, the total<br />

feedstock energy is 33,000 MJ/Mt glyphosate. Thus, the cumulative energy demand is 181,000 MJ/Mt glyphosate.<br />

Two allocation choices <strong>in</strong> the glyphosate supply cha<strong>in</strong> are <strong>in</strong> the ammonia gtg, which produces CO2, and<br />

the white phosphorus gtg, which produces slag and fuel gas. We tested the impact of these allocation<br />

choices by s<strong>et</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g the allocation to ammonia and phosphorus to 1. Thus, no <strong>in</strong>ventories were allocated to<br />

CO2, slag, or fuel gases. In that case, the process energy, nre, and cumulative energy demands were 97, 187,<br />

and 235 MJ/kg glyphosate.<br />

Table 2. Cradle to gate energies for 1000 kg glyphosate.<br />

Chemicals Mass By-products<br />

Allocation<br />

factor<br />

Energy with allocation, MJ/1000kg glyphosate<br />

Dow-<br />

Direct use Trans- Potential Total n<strong>et</strong><br />

kg / 1000 kg glyphosate kg / kg chemical Electricity therm Steam of fuel port* recovery energy<br />

glyphosate 1,000 1.00 500 0 7.72E+04 0 440 -1.48E+04 6.33E+04<br />

Oxygen<br />

0.0553 kg Argon; 3.26 kg<br />

641 Nitrogen; 0.231 403 0 0 0 0 -2.88 401<br />

PMIDA 1,422 1.00 25.1 0 2,172 0 626 -745 2,079<br />

DSIDA <strong>in</strong> 37pct sol 1,186<br />

1.25 kg Ethanol Am<strong>in</strong>e;<br />

0.235 kg Tri<strong>et</strong>hanol am<strong>in</strong>e;<br />

0.0141 kg tri<strong>et</strong>hanol am<strong>in</strong>e, 85<br />

1.00 340 0 1,570 0 0 -7,323 -5,413<br />

di<strong>et</strong>hanol am<strong>in</strong>e 765 wt pct; 0.400 149 0 3,094 0 337 -1,043 2,536<br />

Ammonia 169 1.18 kg CO2;<br />

3.00E-03 kg Butane; 0.0400<br />

kg Ethane; 7.00E-03 kg LPG<br />

condensate; 0.0100 kg<br />

0.459 126 0 738 642 74.5 -606 976<br />

Natural gas 205 Propane; 0.943 0 0 0 698 0 0 698<br />

nitrogen from air 65.1 0.358 kg oxygen from air; 0.736 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

oxygen from air 882 2.79 kg nitrogen from air; 0.264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Water for rxn 1,005 1.00 0.809 0 0 0 0 0 0.809<br />

Ethylene oxide 603<br />

0.480 kg C4 stream; 0.0881<br />

kg fuel oil; 0.0484 kg<br />

Hydrogen; 0.569 kg CH4;<br />

0.634 kg Propylene; 1.03 kg<br />

1.00 1,169 0 22.5 0 265 -3,426 -1,970<br />

Ethylene 452 pyrolysis gas;<br />

1.55 kg heavy gas oil, from<br />

distillation; 0.644 kg<br />

kerosene, from distillation;<br />

0.542 kg light gas oil, from<br />

distillation; 0.711 kg residum,<br />

0.260 643 0 1,070 5,237 199 -1,280 5,869<br />

489

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!