28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 7C: FOOD CHAIN AND FOOD WASTE 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

The raw materials, distribution and manufacture of the ready-made meal are the most important contributors<br />

to most impacts from this system. For example, as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3, the raw materials and distribution<br />

each contribute around 25% to the GWP of the ready-made meal, followed by pre-process<strong>in</strong>g and meal<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g (~17% each); packag<strong>in</strong>g contributes around 7%. Meal preparation at home has a relatively<br />

small impact (2%). Among the <strong>in</strong>gredients, chicken and tomato are the ma<strong>in</strong> hotspots, contribut<strong>in</strong>g 90% to<br />

GWP from the raw materials stage.<br />

Figure 2. Environmental impacts of the ready- and home-made meals<br />

Figure 3. GWP hotspots for the ready- and home-made meals<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

This study has exam<strong>in</strong>ed the life cycle environmental impacts of a typical ready-made meal produced and<br />

consumed <strong>in</strong> the UK. The results suggest that prepar<strong>in</strong>g the same meal at home is environmentally more<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able than the ready-made meal when the same <strong>in</strong>gredients are used: the difference <strong>in</strong> the impacts is on<br />

average 2.7 times <strong>in</strong> favour of the home-made meal (or 1.23 times if the difference <strong>in</strong> ozone layer depl<strong>et</strong>ion<br />

is not considered). The ma<strong>in</strong> reason for this is the avoidance of refrigerant leakage and lower amount of food<br />

waste for the home-made meal system.<br />

646<br />

Global warm<strong>in</strong>g potential (kg/functional unit)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

3.83<br />

3.45<br />

GWP [kg CO2 eq.]<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0.96<br />

ADP fossil [MJ]<br />

1.69<br />

29.51<br />

17.22<br />

ADP elements [g Sb eq.]<br />

Ingredients Preprocess<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0.61<br />

0.68<br />

4.64<br />

14.03<br />

AP [g SO2 eq.]<br />

0.73<br />

47.65<br />

41.40<br />

0.00<br />

Readiy-made meal Home-made meal<br />

EP [g PO4 eq.]<br />

14.77<br />

12.75<br />

FAETP x 10^-1 [kg DCB eq.]<br />

1.07<br />

2.92<br />

2.30<br />

HTP x 10^-1 [Kg DCB eq.]<br />

0.73<br />

0.08<br />

14.01<br />

11.98<br />

2.03<br />

1.57<br />

MAETP [t DCB eq.]<br />

Ready-made meal Home-made meal<br />

0.24<br />

ODP x 10 [µg R11 eq.]<br />

0.08<br />

0.11<br />

69.17<br />

3.98<br />

2.51<br />

1.87<br />

POCP [g C2H4 eq.]<br />

0.29<br />

0.01<br />

TETP [g DCB eq.]<br />

Manufacture Distribution Consumption Disposal Packag<strong>in</strong>g Total<br />

3.83<br />

12.67<br />

6.92<br />

3.45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!