28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARALLEL SESSION 5A: FOOD LABELLING 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

should be noted here that some products do not y<strong>et</strong> have many companies implement<strong>in</strong>g the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

label so the stakeholder consultation process could not take place. In addition, the companies apply<strong>in</strong>g carbon<br />

footpr<strong>in</strong>t based on the PCRs previously developed by the pioneer<strong>in</strong>g companies do not have any disagreement<br />

issues y<strong>et</strong>, so these can still be used for a while.<br />

3.2. Contents of PCRs<br />

3.2.1. Scope of PCRs<br />

At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, rice and chicken were selected for develop<strong>in</strong>g the national PCRs to test the approach<br />

used <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual product-based PCRs. Rice was of special <strong>in</strong>terest as it is a ma<strong>in</strong> product for Thailand and<br />

the data sources of emission factors from rice fields affect the results significantly. Chicken was another<br />

product selected as it is ma<strong>in</strong>ly exported to EU countries which are active on carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and labell<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Moreover, the manufacturers of these two products have been proactive <strong>in</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Later on, the scope of PCRs of agri-food products was discussed and it was found that each sector has its<br />

own characteristics and should not be considered at the sub-sectorial rather than sectorial level such as Fruit<br />

& Veg<strong>et</strong>ables, Livestock, and Aquatic products. With<strong>in</strong> each sub-sector, both non-processed and processed<br />

products should be considered as the processed products would require the raw materials such as fresh fruits<br />

and veg<strong>et</strong>ables so it is best to deal with the PCR issues tog<strong>et</strong>her. It should be noted here that it is generally<br />

agreed that processed food products with multiple <strong>in</strong>gredients (i.e. veg<strong>et</strong>able, meat, coconut milk, <strong>et</strong>c.)<br />

should be considered <strong>in</strong> a separate PCR but can refer to the related parts <strong>in</strong> PCRs of Fruit & Veg<strong>et</strong>ables,<br />

Livestock, and Aquatic products as required. Meat, milk and egg are considered livestock products, whereas<br />

products from fisheries and aquaculture (from fresh, brackish and sea water) activities are reflected <strong>in</strong><br />

aquatic products.<br />

3.2.2 System boundary<br />

It is generally accepted that the system boundary should cover all life cycle stages <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g at the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

of sale (e.g. chilled storage), pre-consumption (e.g. household storage), consumption (e.g. cook<strong>in</strong>g), and<br />

post-consumption (e.g. food and packag<strong>in</strong>g waste disposal). This is not so for the case of food <strong>in</strong>gredients as<br />

they are only a composition of other food products <strong>in</strong> the forms of dish or meal (Mungkung <strong>et</strong> al., 2010a). It<br />

is also important that the assumptions for po<strong>in</strong>t of sale, pre-consumption, consumption and post-consumption<br />

are on the same basis for the same food products. The assumption at po<strong>in</strong>t of sale is based on the turn-over<br />

rate <strong>in</strong> the real situation. The storage prior to cook<strong>in</strong>g or pre-consumption is def<strong>in</strong>ed based on a standard<br />

scenario. As of now, the use profile is def<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>structions given by producer on the labels<br />

as there is no such data available <strong>in</strong> ISO 14025 as well as the Thai Green Labell<strong>in</strong>g scheme (Ecolabel Type<br />

1). A standard scenario is also applied for the f<strong>in</strong>al waste disposal (assum<strong>in</strong>g there is no food waste, and<br />

packag<strong>in</strong>g waste is totally landfilled). It is worth mention<strong>in</strong>g here that emissions from the office, prototype,<br />

research and development, quality assurance and control, consumer’s travell<strong>in</strong>g are not <strong>in</strong>cluded.<br />

In more d<strong>et</strong>ails, these activities should be <strong>in</strong>cluded: land preparation (prior the crop production), seed<br />

preparation (such as soak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> water, acclimatisation <strong>in</strong> pond, <strong>et</strong>c.), chemicals (such as fertiliser, hormones,<br />

herbicides, v<strong>et</strong>er<strong>in</strong>ary drugs, <strong>et</strong>c.), feed, substrate materials, soil cover<strong>in</strong>g materials, packag<strong>in</strong>g and consumables<br />

for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of capital goods. The activities that should be excluded are: <strong>in</strong>frastructure, equipment,<br />

and mach<strong>in</strong>es. Direct land use change is <strong>in</strong>cluded, but at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g only for crop production (not all land<br />

use changes) and only 20 years back to the date of implement<strong>in</strong>g the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Though it is understood<br />

that the effects of land use change on GHG emissions is enormous, the <strong>in</strong>dustry still feels that develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries will have a major problem due to the lack of support<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

3.2.3. Product description<br />

The <strong>in</strong>formation of product name, brand name, and quality rank<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to the national standard def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Thailand Agriculture Standard (TAS) documents is required <strong>in</strong> describ<strong>in</strong>g the product. All auxiliaries<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>ished product be<strong>in</strong>g sold must also be considered. A practical issue raised by the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry is related to the number of agri-food products which can be classified <strong>in</strong>to some thousands at the<br />

SKU (Stock-Keep<strong>in</strong>g Unit) level. The <strong>in</strong>dustry echoed that the associated costs (for consultancy service,<br />

verification and license) could be a barrier especially for SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises). In this<br />

connection, to promote the adoption of carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t label, product group<strong>in</strong>g is allowed for the sake of<br />

cost reduction for the license (<strong>in</strong>dividual carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t value is still applied for each product across the<br />

whole product group), as follows:<br />

453

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!