28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 3C: SHEEP AND DAIRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

310<br />

Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of sheep farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>France</strong> and New Zealand and<br />

m<strong>et</strong>hodology analysis<br />

Armelle Gac 1 , Stewart Ledgard 2,* , Elise Lor<strong>in</strong>quer 1 , Mark Boyes 2 , André Le Gall 1<br />

1 Institut de l'Elevage, Build<strong>in</strong>g and Environment Department, BP 85225, F-35652 Le Rheu, <strong>France</strong><br />

2 AgResearch, Ruakura Research Station, Hamilton, New Zealand<br />

Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. E-mail: elise.lor<strong>in</strong>quer@idele.fr<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

For eco-labell<strong>in</strong>g of products, the environmental performance is an important factor and this can be significant for meat products.<br />

This study deals with the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of French and New Zealand lamb production at the cradle-to-farm gate. In <strong>France</strong>, the<br />

analysis was performed on two contrast<strong>in</strong>g systems: “<strong>in</strong>-shed lamb” vs “grass lamb”, while <strong>in</strong> New Zealand, the ma<strong>in</strong> “grass” system<br />

was studied. The average carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of “grass” (19 farms) and “<strong>in</strong> shed” (85farms) French lamb was 12.7 and 12.9 kg CO2<br />

eq/kg live weight (LW) sold, respectively, and of the ma<strong>in</strong> New Zealand system (151 farms) was 8.52 kg CO2 eq/kg LW The results<br />

were highly dependent on m<strong>et</strong>hodological choices, especially regard<strong>in</strong>g enteric fermentation assessment and allocation. These results<br />

provide <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to requirements for build<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>ternationally common framework to allow comparison of results.<br />

Keywords: life cycle assessment, lamb, farm<strong>in</strong>g systems, m<strong>et</strong>hodology<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The environment is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important to consumers and there are economic implications<br />

<strong>in</strong> the comparison b<strong>et</strong>ween products based on their environmental performance. For eco-labell<strong>in</strong>g of products,<br />

this issue is particularly important for meat products because of their significant impact on climate<br />

change (Hamershlag, 2011). In this context, environmental assessments of farm systems and agricultural<br />

products are becom<strong>in</strong>g essential at an <strong>in</strong>ternational scale. This should <strong>in</strong>clude identification of m<strong>et</strong>hodology<br />

issues to ensure reliable and equitable comparisons. These environmental assessments will also <strong>in</strong>crease understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the different emissions sources <strong>in</strong> order to identify options to reduce them.<br />

This study deals with the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of French and New Zealand lamb production. These two countries<br />

are both major lamb producers and are react<strong>in</strong>g positively to environmental concerns about their production.<br />

New Zealand is the third largest sheep meat producer <strong>in</strong> the world (0.6 Mt) and is one of the largest<br />

exporters to Europe (FAO). It has <strong>in</strong>itiated environmental research to respond to the eco-labell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

<strong>in</strong> Europe (e.g. Ledgard <strong>et</strong> al., 2010). <strong>France</strong> has the fourth largest ov<strong>in</strong>e flock <strong>in</strong> Europe and the planned<br />

move to environmental labell<strong>in</strong>g of products by the end of <strong>2012</strong> has lead to several recent or ongo<strong>in</strong>g studies<br />

on agricultural products (e.g. Dollé <strong>et</strong> al., 2011, Van der Werf <strong>et</strong> al., 2010). This study has been led by two<br />

applied research teams who have already worked on the topic of environmental impacts of lamb production.<br />

The objectives were to analyse the differences b<strong>et</strong>ween systems and countries and to share knowledge about<br />

m<strong>et</strong>hodological issues, through collaboration (Lor<strong>in</strong>quer, 2011).<br />

2. M<strong>et</strong>hods<br />

2.1. The lamb production systems<br />

The analysis was performed <strong>in</strong> the two countries for the year 2008, on a sample of farms. In <strong>France</strong>, sheep<br />

meat comes from a large diversity of farm<strong>in</strong>g systems, all with a significant part of the year where sheep are<br />

<strong>in</strong>-doors. A sample of farms represent<strong>in</strong>g two contrast<strong>in</strong>g specialised systems was selected: “<strong>in</strong>-shed lamb”<br />

(85 survey farms with significant use of hous<strong>in</strong>g systems) vs “grass lamb” (19 survey farms with significant<br />

use of perennial grasslands) (Table 1). The data comes from the French Breed<strong>in</strong>g N<strong>et</strong>work database led by<br />

Institut de l’Elevage. In New Zealand, the ma<strong>in</strong> “grass” system (mixed sheep and beef on North Island hill<br />

country; perennial grasslands) was studied (Table 1). The data comes from 151 farms surveyed by Beef +<br />

Lamb New Zealand.<br />

Most of the technical data were provided by those survey sources (size of the flock, weight, area of the<br />

farm, practices, <strong>et</strong>c.). Nitrogen excr<strong>et</strong>ion and the dry matter <strong>in</strong>take by the animals was assessed us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

on the forage stocks and feed purchased by farms <strong>in</strong> <strong>France</strong>. In New Zealand it was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

validated energy-requirement model (Clark <strong>et</strong> al., 2007; from the National Inventory m<strong>et</strong>hods) based on<br />

animal productivity data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!