28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KEYNOTE SESSION 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

ENVIFOOD Protocol: launch of the collectively-agreed sectorial<br />

m<strong>et</strong>hodology for assess<strong>in</strong>g the environmental performance of food and<br />

dr<strong>in</strong>k products <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

Camillo De Camillis 1,* , Jean-Christophe Bligny 2 , David Penn<strong>in</strong>gton 1 , Balázs Pályi 3 , Christian Bauer 4 , Urs<br />

Schenker 5 , Henry K<strong>in</strong>g 6 , Lars Lundquist 5 , Nicolas Mart<strong>in</strong> 7 , Nicole Unger 6 , Laura Draucker 8 , Øyv<strong>in</strong>d Vessia 9 ,<br />

Coen Blomsma 10 , Nathan Pell<strong>et</strong>ier 1 , Hans Blonk 11 , Rudi Sueys 12 , Anna Papagrigoraki 13 , Pascal Gréverath 14 ,<br />

Herbert Aich<strong>in</strong>ger 15 , Jean-Pierre Rennaud 16<br />

1 European Commission, Jo<strong>in</strong>t Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Environment and Susta<strong>in</strong>ability (IES), via Enrico Fermi 2749,<br />

21027 Ispra (Va), Italy<br />

2 Danone, 11 Avenue Géneral Dupas, 74500 Evian, <strong>France</strong><br />

3 <strong>Food</strong>Dr<strong>in</strong>kEurope, Avenue des Arts 43, 1040 Brussels, Belgium<br />

4 SIG Combibloc, Rurstrasse 58, 52441 L<strong>in</strong>nich, Germany<br />

5 Nestec Ltd, Nestlé Research Center, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, 1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland<br />

6 Unilever Saf<strong>et</strong>y and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth Park, Sharnbrook, MK44 1LQ Bedford, UK<br />

7 FEFAC, Rue de la Loi, 223, Bte 2 B-1040 Bruxelles, Belgium<br />

8 World Resources Institute (WRI), 10 G St. NE, Suite 800, 20002 Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, USA<br />

9 European Commission, DG Energy, BRU-DM24 04/109, 1040 Brussels, Belgium<br />

10 FEDIOL, Avenue de Tervuren 168, 1150 Bruxelles, Belgium<br />

11 Blonk Milieu Advies, Grav<strong>in</strong> Beatrixstraat 34, 2805 PJ Gouda, The N<strong>et</strong>herlands<br />

12 Coca-Cola Europe, Bergense Steenweg 1424, 1070 Brussels, Belgium<br />

13 CEFS, Avenue de Tervuren 182, B-1150 Brussels, Belgium<br />

14 Nestlé, Avenue Nestlé 55, 1800 Vevey, Switzerland<br />

15 European Commission, DG Environment, Avenue de Beaulieu 5, 1049 Brussels, Belgium<br />

16 Danone Institute, Route Départementale 128, 91767 Palaiseau, <strong>France</strong><br />

Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. E-mail: camillo.de-camillis@jrc.ec.europa.eu<br />

The views expressed <strong>in</strong> this paper are personal and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the European Commission.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Lack of consistency <strong>in</strong> both the substance and application of m<strong>et</strong>hodologies and guidel<strong>in</strong>es for assess<strong>in</strong>g and communicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

environmental performance of food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products has the potential to confuse consumers and other stakeholders <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the<br />

food and dr<strong>in</strong>k supply cha<strong>in</strong>s. Furthermore, it poses an unnecessary burden on those organisations requested to evaluate the environmental<br />

performance of their product accord<strong>in</strong>g to several different m<strong>et</strong>hodologies.<br />

In order to address this issue, bus<strong>in</strong>ess associations and other food supply cha<strong>in</strong> partners have <strong>in</strong>volved the European Commission <strong>in</strong><br />

establish<strong>in</strong>g the European <strong>Food</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>able Consumption and Production (SCP) Round Table. S<strong>in</strong>ce 2009, Round Table members<br />

have been work<strong>in</strong>g tog<strong>et</strong>her on a commonly-agreed and science-based framework for assessment and communication of the environmental<br />

performance of food and beverage products <strong>in</strong> Europe. The first milestone was reached <strong>in</strong> 2010 when Round Table members<br />

agreed on a s<strong>et</strong> of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples to guide work<strong>in</strong>g groups <strong>in</strong> harmoniz<strong>in</strong>g relevant approaches for assessment and communication.<br />

On this basis, the Round Table Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 1 reached agreement on key m<strong>et</strong>hodological aspects for environmental assessment at<br />

a scientific workshop <strong>in</strong> 2010. A d<strong>et</strong>ailed analysis of relevant data, m<strong>et</strong>hodologies and guidel<strong>in</strong>es for assess<strong>in</strong>g the environmental<br />

performance of foods and dr<strong>in</strong>ks was conducted follow<strong>in</strong>g the 2010 workshop. This analysis identified aspects of Life Cycle Assessment<br />

(<strong>LCA</strong>) practice where exist<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>et</strong>hodologies agree, as well as <strong>in</strong>consistencies among exist<strong>in</strong>g approaches. A second workshop<br />

was organized <strong>in</strong> 2011 to reach consensus on the outstand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>consistencies. Rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g unresolved issues were further discussed<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 1, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the release of an advanced draft of what will be the future Round Table m<strong>et</strong>hodology for<br />

environmental assessment named the ENVIFOOD Protocol. A public consultation scheduled dur<strong>in</strong>g the last quarter of <strong>2012</strong> will be<br />

followed by the publication of the ENVIFOOD Protocol <strong>in</strong> 2013. In conjunction with its publication, the ENVIFOOD Protocol will<br />

be tested through a range of pilot studies and the feedback used for ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the guidance.<br />

The ENVIFOOD Protocol provides guidance to support those environmental assessments of food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

conducted <strong>in</strong> the context of:<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess as well as bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-consumer communication (focus of the Round Table Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 2);<br />

The identification of environmental improvement options (focus of the Round Table Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 3).<br />

This paper gives a general overview of the process to arrive at the ENVIFOOD Protocol. The paper also illustrates possible next<br />

steps of the Round Table Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 1. Round Table members are, <strong>in</strong> fact, discuss<strong>in</strong>g how to develop and adopt Product Category<br />

Rules (PCR) <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the ENVIFOOD Protocol. In parallel, Round Table members are also discuss<strong>in</strong>g how to obta<strong>in</strong> adequate<br />

data for assessment and streaml<strong>in</strong>ed tools. The establishment of the ENVIFOOD Protocol and PCRs will allow the development<br />

of user-friendly and affordable tools for assessment and communication of environmental impacts, thus reduc<strong>in</strong>g the burdens of<br />

undertak<strong>in</strong>g such assessments, <strong>in</strong> particular for SME’s.<br />

Keywords: Round Table, susta<strong>in</strong>able consumption and production, harmonisation, assessment m<strong>et</strong>hodology, ENVIFOOD Protocol<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Members of the European <strong>Food</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>able Consumption and Production Round Table (SCP Round Table)<br />

are committed to help<strong>in</strong>g consumers and other stakeholders make <strong>in</strong>formed choices by provid<strong>in</strong>g them<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!