28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 4A: CARBON FOOTPRINT 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

Application of PAS 2050-1 supplementary requirements for<br />

horticultural products: carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of pumpk<strong>in</strong> and asparagus<br />

Michael Blanke * , Florian Schaefer<br />

INRES - University of Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany<br />

* Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. E-mail: mmblanke@uni-bonn.de<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This contribution provides <strong>in</strong>formation on the new PAS 2050-1 supplementary requirements (formerly ‘Product Category Rules –<br />

PCRs) for horticultural products released <strong>in</strong> March <strong>2012</strong>. This is one of the first supplementary requirements and may be used as a<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>e for <strong>in</strong>dustries other than horticulture such as the food <strong>in</strong>dustry. The data presented orig<strong>in</strong>ate from one of the five <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

pilot projects. In the German application trial, asparagus, strawberry, rhubarb and pumpk<strong>in</strong> were employed. The new PAS<br />

2050-1 <strong>in</strong>cludes recommendations for a "cradle to gate" or "bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess" approach. It provides an Excel tool for both land<br />

use change (LUC) and the nitrogen balance with<strong>in</strong> a crop rotation. Examples will be given for issues to be excluded such as Capital<br />

goods or <strong>in</strong>cluded such as biogenic carbon of the horticultural product. The objective of this contribution was to d<strong>et</strong>erm<strong>in</strong>e experiences<br />

(pro and cons) of the implementation of these new supplementary requirements (‘SRs’) for horticultural products to the PAS<br />

2050: 2011 as part of this pilot study, while calculat<strong>in</strong>g the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t for the four crops, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g autumn pumpk<strong>in</strong> and asparagus<br />

<strong>in</strong> Germany.<br />

Three pumpk<strong>in</strong> farms with different pumpk<strong>in</strong> cultivation were chosen: a) a small scale organic (50 kg N/ha), b) a small scale <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

production (IP) (120 kg N/ha), and c) a large scale bus<strong>in</strong>ess enterprise (70 kg N/ha). Area viz. hectare was chosen as the first<br />

and mass i.e. kg saleable product as the second functional unit. System boundaries ranged from plantl<strong>et</strong> or seed acquisition to sale.<br />

The carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t at the cultivation level (FCF) ranged b<strong>et</strong>ween 157 kg CO2eq/ha (organic) and 251 kg CO2eq/ha (small scale<br />

(IP)). Tak<strong>in</strong>g the yield <strong>in</strong>to account the mass specific Carbon Footpr<strong>in</strong>t was from 8 g CO2eq/kg saleable pumpk<strong>in</strong> to 20 g CO2eq/kg<br />

saleable pumpk<strong>in</strong>. The nitrous oxide emissions, which orig<strong>in</strong>ated from the nitrogen fertilisation, were calculated based on 0.7% N2O<br />

per kg applied N. They were the most relevant source of GHG emissions <strong>in</strong> the cultivation phase. Neither the form (organic or <strong>in</strong>organic)<br />

nor the amount of applied nitrogen (2.5-fold difference) <strong>in</strong>fluenced the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t. However, carbon reduction potentials<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude use of nitrification <strong>in</strong>hibitors such as DMPP and DCD, which reduce the nitrous oxide emissions by ca. 47 or 40%, respectively,<br />

or the CULTAN fertilisation system. Plant protection (m<strong>et</strong>hiocarb <strong>in</strong> the IP) contributed less than 1% to the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

The large specialised farm showed the best carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of 8 g CO2eq/kg pumpk<strong>in</strong> due to the use of potassium fertiliser and 3fold<br />

larger yields (18 t/ha versus 5.8 t/ha <strong>in</strong> the organic) and, to a lesser extent, its sheer scale. On the other two farms, cultivation is<br />

more extensive with the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come not from pumpk<strong>in</strong>; any <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> farm size or their pumpk<strong>in</strong> acreage would not improve their<br />

efficacy and cradle-to-gate carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

The farm carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of asparagus (FCF), also corrected for biogenic carbon (0.198 t CO2-e/ha/a), was 2.8 t CO2-e/ha. The<br />

product carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t for asparagus (PCF – B2C), calculated over an 11-year life-span of the orchard <strong>in</strong> Germany <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

first unproductive years, was 801 g CO2eq/kg saleable asparagus.<br />

In conclusion, the present application trial led to 3-17% less product carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>ts (PCF) due to the offs<strong>et</strong> of the biogenic carbon<br />

<strong>in</strong> the harvested produce and confirmed the benefits and suitability of PAS 2050-1 for the horticultural <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Keywords: carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t, PAS 2050-1, horticultural products, application trial, land use change (LUC)<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The PAS 2050-1 ‘Assessment of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from horticultural products‘ was<br />

developed as one of the first product category rules (PCR) and for the agri-food sector. Other sectors may<br />

develop their own PCRs and use or modify the PAS 2050-1 <strong>in</strong> full or <strong>in</strong> part. The authors were part of the<br />

steer<strong>in</strong>g group for the development of this PAS 2050-1 and hosted one out of five pilot projects for its potential<br />

implementation <strong>in</strong> horticulture (Table1). This <strong>in</strong>cluded pumpk<strong>in</strong>, asparagus, rhubarb and strawberry <strong>in</strong><br />

Germany (BSI, <strong>2012</strong>).<br />

Table 1. Pilot projects for the PAS 2050-1 (horticulture) dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter 2011/<strong>2012</strong><br />

Pilot project <strong>in</strong>stitution Country Crop<br />

<strong>Food</strong> Research New Zealand Kiwi (open cultivation)<br />

Karen Fisher Great Brita<strong>in</strong> Orange juice (product)<br />

IRTA , Lleida Spa<strong>in</strong> Protected apple under hailn<strong>et</strong><br />

Productshap Tu<strong>in</strong>bouw, Gouda N<strong>et</strong>herlands Greenhouse veg<strong>et</strong>ables and flowers, nursery trees and conta<strong>in</strong>er plants<br />

University of Bonn, INRES –<br />

Horticultural Science<br />

Germany Pumpk<strong>in</strong>, rhubarb, asparagus, strawberry (all field production)<br />

2. Materials and M<strong>et</strong>hods<br />

2.1 Features of PAS 2050-1 (March, <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

The PAS 2050-1 is now designated as ‘Supplemental Requirements’ (SR) to PAS 2050 rather than as<br />

‘PCR- Product Category Rule(s)’. It is the first, freely and publicly available guidel<strong>in</strong>e for all horticultural<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!