28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GROUP 1, SESSION A: ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

18. Life cycle th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g applied to an immunological product (vacc<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

used for boar ta<strong>in</strong>t control <strong>in</strong> male pigs<br />

Paulo Moraes 1 , Jim Allison 1 , Joseph A. Rob<strong>in</strong>son 1 , Stéphan Mart<strong>in</strong> 1 , Gian Luca Baldo 2 , Paola Borla 2<br />

1 Pfizer Animal Health, USA and Europe, 2 Life Cycle Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g (LCE), Italy, * Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. E-<br />

mail: baldo@studiolce.it<br />

In 2009, Pfizer Animal Health decided to apply the <strong>LCA</strong> m<strong>et</strong>hodology to some <strong>in</strong>novative products, with a<br />

first case-study on Improvac ® , an immunological product (vacc<strong>in</strong>e) for male pigs that provides farmers with<br />

an alternative way to avoid the problem of boar ta<strong>in</strong>t: its use <strong>in</strong>creases the efficiency of male pig production<br />

and could consequently provide life-cycle environmental benefits.<br />

A mean<strong>in</strong>gful <strong>LCA</strong> study of the vacc<strong>in</strong>e required the collection, with a global perspective, of reliable data<br />

about the life-cycle environmental burden of an average farm that uses or not the product. Information from<br />

with<strong>in</strong>-farm comparative studies was also <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the analysis. This led to an understand<strong>in</strong>g of any<br />

possible environmental benefits of the vacc<strong>in</strong>e’s adoption by benchmark<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st exist<strong>in</strong>g, traditional practices<br />

(castration).<br />

The two most relevant phases contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the life-cycle environmental burden of the exam<strong>in</strong>ed system are<br />

the production of feed given to pigs and pig slurry management (Fig. 1). Start<strong>in</strong>g from the feed recipe, an<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g close exam<strong>in</strong>ation was conducted on agricultural practices by country, provid<strong>in</strong>g a valuable description<br />

of how feed production burden changes accord<strong>in</strong>g to local conditions (yields, fertiliser use, <strong>et</strong>c.).<br />

The same conclusion applies to different slurry management procedures and technologies. Overall, the <strong>LCA</strong><br />

provided mean<strong>in</strong>gful <strong>in</strong>formation for use by farmers who are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g their carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

when rear<strong>in</strong>g sw<strong>in</strong>e for pork meat.<br />

The study shows a reduction <strong>in</strong> the environmental impacts considered for the vacc<strong>in</strong>ated pig life cycle compared<br />

to the castrated one. In particular, the calculated carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t for the Improvac pig system demonstrates<br />

a reduction vs. the physically castrated pig system of 3.7% <strong>in</strong> terms of kg live-weight; given the annual<br />

production of pigs reared globally for prote<strong>in</strong> consumption (about 500M males), this carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

reduction is <strong>in</strong>crementally significant and supports the adoption of Improvac over the traditional approach of<br />

castrat<strong>in</strong>g boars.<br />

The product is approved for use and distributed <strong>in</strong> nearly all pig produc<strong>in</strong>g countries worldwide: from South<br />

America to the US and from Europe to Australia, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the world leader <strong>in</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>e production, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

The Improvac Environmental Product Declaration was first published <strong>in</strong> January 2011 on the International<br />

EPD register and renewed <strong>in</strong> early <strong>2012</strong> after the required external review by a third party<br />

(www.environdec.com).<br />

References<br />

Allison J., McKeith F., C Souza, Boler D., Killefer J. Hennessy D., 2009. Impact of us<strong>in</strong>g vacc<strong>in</strong>ation with<br />

IMPROVAC® rather than physical castration on the carcass characteristics of f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g male pigs <strong>in</strong><br />

ICOMST, 55 th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Copenhagen 16-21 August 2009,<br />

Denmark, paper n° 7.38.<br />

Bass<strong>et</strong>-Mens C., Van der Werf H.M.G., Durand P., L<strong>et</strong>erme P., 2006. Implications of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty and variability<br />

<strong>in</strong> the life cycle assessment of pig production systems. Int J <strong>LCA</strong> 11, 298-304.<br />

Dunshea F., Colantoni C., Howard K., McCauley I., Jackson P., Long K.A., Lopaticki S., Nugent E.A.,<br />

Simons J.A., Walker J., Hennessy D.P., 2001. Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation of boars with a GnRH vacc<strong>in</strong>e (Improvac®)<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ates boar ta<strong>in</strong>t and <strong>in</strong>creases growth performance. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 2524-2535.<br />

European Commission, 2003. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on<br />

Best Available Techniques for Intensive Rear<strong>in</strong>g of Poultry and Pigs. JRC.<br />

Fàbrega E., Velarde A., Cros J., Gispert M., Suárez P., Tibau J., Soler J., 2010. Effect of vacc<strong>in</strong>ation aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

gonadotroph<strong>in</strong>-releas<strong>in</strong>g hormone, us<strong>in</strong>g Improvac®, on growth performance, body composition, behaviour<br />

and acute phase prote<strong>in</strong>s. Livest Prod Sci 132, 53-59.<br />

Pfizer Animal Health, 2011. Environmental Product Declaration of Improvac (N° S-P-00261). The EPD<br />

International System.<br />

676

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!