28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARALLEL SESSION 6B: FISHIERIES, SOIL, AND EMERGY METHODS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

3.2 W<strong>in</strong>e eMergy results<br />

The EME output of the annual production was 9.25E+15 seJ/ha and 9.64E+15 seJ/ha for CW and OW,<br />

respectively (Table 2). However, the UEV (per bottle of w<strong>in</strong>e) of the CW is almost twice the UEV of the<br />

OW (i.e. 4.22E+12 seJ/bottle and 2.75E+12 seJ/bottle, respectively). In Table 2 <strong>in</strong>ventory data (columns 3,<br />

4) and f<strong>in</strong>al calculation results are shown, divided for local resources, agricultural phase, process<strong>in</strong>g phase<br />

and human labour.<br />

Table 2. Emergy flows and UEVs for conventional (CW) and organic (OW) w<strong>in</strong>e productions. Square<br />

brack<strong>et</strong>=references for UEV; Type of <strong>in</strong>put: R= local renewable resources, N= local non-renewable<br />

resources, F=non-local purchased <strong>in</strong>puts.<br />

3.3 Olive oil <strong>LCA</strong> results<br />

Table 3 shows the LCIA comparison b<strong>et</strong>ween the two production systems: likewise for w<strong>in</strong>e, the CO presents<br />

the higher impacts, while regard<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle phases, the agricultural phase (phase 1) presents higher impact<br />

values both for OO and CO.<br />

Table 3. LCIA of organic and conventional olive oil productions. Data reported for functional unit (1 kg<br />

bottled olive oil).<br />

3.4 Olive oil eMergy results<br />

EME output is 2.50E+16 sej/ha/yr and 9.35E+15 sej/ha/yr as total eMergy flows and 5.18E+13 seJ/bottle<br />

and 3.74E+13 seJ/bottle as UEVs for CO and OO, respectively. In Table 4 <strong>in</strong>ventory data (columns 3, 4) and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al calculation results are shown, divided by local resources, agricultural phase, process<strong>in</strong>g phase and human<br />

labour.<br />

536<br />

Emergy Fluxes (sej/ha/yr)<br />

Input Units Quantity/yr (CW) Quantity/yr (OW) Ref. UEV TYPE OF INPUT CONVENTIONAL WINE (CW) ORGANIC WINE (OW)<br />

LOCAL RESOURCES<br />

sunlight J 8,49E+11 8,49E+11 [1] R 8,49E+11 8,49E+11<br />

ra<strong>in</strong> g 1,67E+08 1,67E+08 [2] R 1,40E+13 1,40E+13<br />

geothermal heat J 7,16E+08 7,16E+08 [2] R 4,98E+12 4,98E+12<br />

loss of topsoil J 1,03E+08 1,03E+08 [3] N 7,45E+12 7,45E+12<br />

PHASE 1<br />

fertilizer g 1.21E+05 [3] F 1,98E+15<br />

diesel J 9,92E+09 1,75E+10 [5] F 6,53E+14 1,15E+15<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>ery g 7,74E+03 1,68E+04 [7] F 5,08E+13 1,03E+14<br />

wood g 6,02E+05 3,73E+05 [7] 50%R; 50%F 2,06E+10 1,28E+10<br />

pesticides g 1,04E+04 5,74E+04 [3] F 1,51E+14 8,32E+14<br />

concr<strong>et</strong>e g 3,57E+04 [12] F 6,35E+13<br />

PHASE 2<br />

water g 3,26E+05 9,72E+07 [8] F 5,70E+11 1,70E+14<br />

electricity J 8,67E+07 2,67E+08 [4] F 1,03E+13 3,17E+13<br />

chemicals g 5,71E+02 3,50E+01 [3] F 8,28E+12 1,30E+13<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>ery g 3,07E+04 3,89E+04 [7] F 2,01E+14 2,30E+14<br />

PHASE 3<br />

glass g 1,78E+06 1,87E+06 [10] F 5,49E+15 5,79E+15<br />

cork g 3,02E+04 4,83E+04 [10] F 4,49E+13 7,19E+13<br />

paper g 8,58E+03 1,37E+04 [11] F 4,25E+13 6,78E+13<br />

glue g 8,92E+02 1,43E+03 [10] F 8,83E+12 1,42E+13<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>ium g 4,49E+03 7,19E+03 [10] F 2,65E+13 4,25E+13<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>ery g 2,10E+03 6,13E+03 [7] F 1,38E+13 3,62E+13<br />

electricity J 1,89E+08 [4] F 2,25E+13<br />

diesel J 1,01E+09 [5] F 6,65E+13<br />

HUMAN LABOUR h 1,73E+02 3,16E+02 [6] 10%R; 90%F 5,10E+14 9,33E+14<br />

TOTAL 9,25E+15 9,64E+15<br />

WINE (sej/g) g 2,19E+06 3,50E+06 4,22E+09 2,75E+09<br />

WINE (sej/BOTTLE OF WINE) 4,22E+12 2,75E+12<br />

Impact category unit conventional oil (CO)organic oil (OO)<br />

AP kg SO2 eq. 2,10E-01 6,00E-02<br />

EP kg PO4 eq. 7,00E-01 1,00E-02<br />

GWP100 kg CO2 eq. 2,64E+01 9,64E+00<br />

POP kg C2H4 eq. 1,20E-02 2,00E-03<br />

Literature references for UEV<br />

[1] Odum H.T., 1996.<br />

[2] Odum H.T.,<strong>et</strong> al. 2000.<br />

[3] Brandt-Williams S. L., 2002.<br />

[4] Tiezzi E. <strong>et</strong> al., 2001.<br />

[5] Bastianoni S. <strong>et</strong> al., 2009<br />

[6] Pulselli, R.M., <strong>et</strong> al., 2008.<br />

[7] Brown M.T., Bardi E., 2001.<br />

[8] Pulselli F. M.,<strong>et</strong> al., 2011.<br />

[9] Campbell D.E. <strong>et</strong> al. 2002.<br />

[10] Buranakarn, V. 1998.<br />

[11] Tilley, D.R., 1999.<br />

[12] Pulselli, R.M., <strong>et</strong> al., 2007.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!