28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 6C: POULTRY AND PORK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

gaard (2011). In scenario two, the amount of corn <strong>in</strong> the di<strong>et</strong> was decreased, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> less demand for corn<br />

production compared to scenario one. Soybean meal was not considered a constra<strong>in</strong>t product either (Dalgaard,<br />

2008), and it was therefore modelled as soybean meal produced <strong>in</strong> Brazil (Dalgaard, 2011). In scenario<br />

two less soybean meal was needed <strong>in</strong> the feed formulation compared to scenario one, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the demand<br />

for soybean meal.<br />

542<br />

Barley<br />

Barley<br />

Production<br />

Supplement<br />

production<br />

Enzyme<br />

production<br />

Axtra XAP<br />

Fertiliser<br />

production<br />

Barley<br />

Ethanol<br />

production<br />

Supplements<br />

DDGs<br />

DDGs<br />

Animal feed<br />

production<br />

Meat and bone<br />

Broiler feed<br />

production<br />

Feed<br />

Pig and poultry fats<br />

Slaughter<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

render<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Meat and bone<br />

Broiler<br />

production<br />

Manure<br />

Feed<br />

Manure use<br />

Leach<strong>in</strong>g from field<br />

Pig and poultry fats<br />

Soy<br />

Soy<br />

Corn<br />

Soy<br />

Emission from<br />

stabels and<br />

manure storage<br />

Soy<br />

production<br />

Corn<br />

production<br />

Emissions from the<br />

field<br />

Figure 1. System boundary <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>al mechanisms. The dotted and full l<strong>in</strong>es illustrate the changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> demand for different products b<strong>et</strong>ween scenario one and two. The dotted l<strong>in</strong>e illustrates a decrease <strong>in</strong> demand<br />

for the product and the full l<strong>in</strong>e illustrates an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> demand for the product <strong>in</strong> scenario two compared<br />

to scenario one.<br />

DDGS is a constra<strong>in</strong>t by-product from bio <strong>et</strong>hanol production. DDGS is predom<strong>in</strong>ately used <strong>in</strong> livestock<br />

feed (Saunders and Rosentrater, 2008). An <strong>in</strong>creased demand for DDGS will not lead to an <strong>in</strong>creased production<br />

of DDGS, as this is d<strong>et</strong>erm<strong>in</strong>ed by the demand for <strong>et</strong>hanol, <strong>in</strong>stead, it will result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creased production<br />

of the marg<strong>in</strong>al feed energy and the marg<strong>in</strong>al feed prote<strong>in</strong>. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Weidema (2003), the marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />

feed prote<strong>in</strong> is soybean meal, and the marg<strong>in</strong>al feed energy is barley. Data on soybean meal and barley was<br />

based on Dalgaard (2011). In scenario two, an <strong>in</strong>creased ratio of DDGS was used <strong>in</strong> the feed formulation<br />

compared to scenario one, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> less DDGS available for other animal feed production, and thereby an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased demand for barley and soybean meal. Meat and bone meal was also considered a constra<strong>in</strong>t byproduct.<br />

The majority of rendered prote<strong>in</strong> products <strong>in</strong> the US and Canada are used as animal feed (Jakanowski,<br />

2011). In scenario two, the amount of meat and bone meal was decreased <strong>in</strong> the feed formulation<br />

compared to scenario one. This will result <strong>in</strong> more meat and bone meal available for the rest of animal feed<br />

production, thereby decreas<strong>in</strong>g the demand for the marg<strong>in</strong>al feed energy and the marg<strong>in</strong>al feed prote<strong>in</strong>. In the<br />

feed formulations pig and poultry fat was used as the fat source, but it could be any other suitable source of<br />

fats and greases. Rendered fats and greases were also considered a constra<strong>in</strong>t by-product. Rendered fats and<br />

greases have several uses the ma<strong>in</strong> uses be<strong>in</strong>g as a feed <strong>in</strong>gredient, <strong>in</strong> the oleochemical <strong>in</strong>dustry and as a<br />

biofuel. The livestock <strong>in</strong>dustry is the largest user of rendered fats and greases, but the biodiesel production<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry might be the fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g mark<strong>et</strong> for rendered fats and greases (NRA, 2011a; 2011b). In this<br />

study the livestock <strong>in</strong>dustry was used as the marg<strong>in</strong>al use of rendered fats and greases. In scenario two, less<br />

pig and poultry fats were needed compared to scenario one, mak<strong>in</strong>g more pig and poultry fat available for the<br />

rest of animal feed production, decreas<strong>in</strong>g the demand for the marg<strong>in</strong>al feed energy. In scenario two there

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!