28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARALLEL SESSION 6C: POULTRY AND PORK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

Table 1. Agricultural production data for three pig production systems <strong>in</strong> Switzerland (CH conv., label, organic),<br />

Germany (DE) and Denmark (DK).<br />

CH DE DK<br />

conv. label organic<br />

Rate of turnover [number/year] 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.7 3.9<br />

Mortality [%] 1.29 1.12 1.12 3.0 4.3<br />

Live weight at start [kg LG] 24 24 24 25 30<br />

Live weight at slaughter [kg LG] 102 100 103 115 102<br />

Length of fatten<strong>in</strong>g period [d] 106 103 110 128 89<br />

Daily ga<strong>in</strong>s [g/d] 740 740 720 700 810<br />

Feed conversion ratio 1: [kg/kg] 2.87 3.04 2.85 3.00 2.76<br />

Live weight ga<strong>in</strong> per place unit [kg LW/year] 234 236 229 243 269<br />

Floor type partly partly partly fully slatted 50:50 partly /<br />

slatted slatted slatted<br />

fully slatted<br />

Outdoor run no yes yes no no<br />

Table 2. Agricultural production data for three chicken production systems <strong>in</strong> Switzerland (CH conv., label,<br />

organic) and <strong>France</strong> (FR) and Brazil (BR CW and BR S).<br />

CH FR BR<br />

conv. label organic CW S<br />

Length of fatten<strong>in</strong>g period [d] 35 56 21 + 42 a 40 42 42<br />

Rate of turnover [number/year] 8.69 5.79 7.45 6.0 6.0 6.4<br />

Break b<strong>et</strong>ween production cycles [d] 7 7 7 20.8 18.8 15.0<br />

Live weight at slaughter [kg LG] 1.92 1.85 1.75 1.92 2.40 2.48<br />

Daily ga<strong>in</strong>s [g/d] 54 32 27 47 56 58<br />

Feed conversion ratio 1: [kg/kg] 1.65 2.17 2.42 1.87 1.89 1.86<br />

Mortality [%] 3.05 2.50 3.50 4.1 4.2 4.4<br />

Outdoor run [m 2 per animal] - 2.00 2.05 - - -<br />

a A 21-day rear<strong>in</strong>g phase takes places <strong>in</strong> a second build<strong>in</strong>g parallel to fatten<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Table 3. Considered environmental impacts (Nemecek <strong>et</strong> al., 2010).<br />

Category Environmental impact<br />

Resource use Demand for non-renewable energy resources (oil, coal and lignite, natural gas and uranium), us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

management the upper heat<strong>in</strong>g or gross calorific value for fossil fuels accord<strong>in</strong>g to Hischier <strong>et</strong> al., (2010).<br />

Global warm<strong>in</strong>g potential over 100 years (accord<strong>in</strong>g to IPCC, 2007).<br />

Ozone formation potential (so-called “summer smog” accord<strong>in</strong>g to the EDIP2003 m<strong>et</strong>hod,<br />

Hauschild und Pott<strong>in</strong>g, 2003).<br />

Use of phosphorus and potassium resources is based on life cycle <strong>in</strong>ventory (LCI) data<br />

Land comp<strong>et</strong>ition is based on LCI data accord<strong>in</strong>g to the CML01 m<strong>et</strong>hod (Gu<strong>in</strong>ée <strong>et</strong> al., 2001)<br />

Deforestation is calculated based on LCI data as the difference of area transformed from forest and<br />

area transformed to forest<br />

Total water use (blue) is calculated on LCI data<br />

Nutrient Eutrophication potential (impact of the losses of N and P to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, ac-<br />

management cord<strong>in</strong>g to the EDIP2003 m<strong>et</strong>hod, Hauschild und Pott<strong>in</strong>g, 2003).<br />

Acidification potential (impact of acidify<strong>in</strong>g substances released <strong>in</strong>to ecosystems, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

EDIP2003 m<strong>et</strong>hod, Hauschild und Pott<strong>in</strong>g, 2003).<br />

Toxicity Terrestrial and aquatic ecotoxicity potentials (accord<strong>in</strong>g to the CML01 m<strong>et</strong>hod, Gu<strong>in</strong>ée <strong>et</strong> al., 2001).<br />

Human toxicity potential (impact of toxic pollutants on human health, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the CML01<br />

m<strong>et</strong>hod, Gu<strong>in</strong>ée <strong>et</strong> al., 2001).<br />

3. Results<br />

When consider<strong>in</strong>g the whole supply cha<strong>in</strong> up to the r<strong>et</strong>ail store, agricultural production was found to be<br />

responsible for at least 75% of the environmental impacts <strong>in</strong> each analysed environmental impact category<br />

(Figure 1 and Figure 2). Post-agricultural processes were of noticeable <strong>in</strong>fluence only for the consumption of<br />

non renewable energy and to some extent for global warm<strong>in</strong>g potential, ozone formation and human toxicity.<br />

Most of the environmental impacts from post-agricultural processes orig<strong>in</strong>ated from slaughter<strong>in</strong>g and meat<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g and from transports <strong>in</strong> case of imported meat (see Mieleitner <strong>et</strong> al., (<strong>2012</strong>) for more d<strong>et</strong>ails).<br />

The major potential of environmental improvement lies <strong>in</strong> animal production. Therefore, the rest of the<br />

result section focuses only the agricultural processes and refers to the functional unit of 1 kg LW.<br />

Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the differences <strong>in</strong> environmental impacts b<strong>et</strong>ween the three Swiss production<br />

systems of pork and chicken meat, respectively (1 kg meat at the r<strong>et</strong>ail store). Both show substantial differences<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween organic and conventional production <strong>in</strong> arable land comp<strong>et</strong>ition (e.g. <strong>in</strong> pig production:<br />

3.8 m 2 a per kg LW vs. 6.9 m 2 a per kg LW under conventional and organic conditions), nutrient management<br />

555

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!