28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARALLEL SESSION 3C: SHEEP AND DAIRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

Given data availability limitations on agricultural land uses and grow<strong>in</strong>g seasons <strong>in</strong> the same year, no allocation<br />

among different types of agricultural production (crop rotations) was established. Allocation b<strong>et</strong>ween<br />

milk and meat was done based on the quantity of feed required to make milk and meat, as feeds have<br />

different available energies for growth and lactation. Other co-products allocations <strong>in</strong>clude soybean and soybean<br />

meal, corn gra<strong>in</strong> and dried distillers gra<strong>in</strong>s with solubles (DDGS).<br />

To perform land use impact assessment related to feed production, feed mix <strong>in</strong> the rations and crop production<br />

data were collected. Average rations (<strong>in</strong> kg dry matter / kg FPCM) that were identified <strong>in</strong> the Milk<br />

carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t study (Thoma <strong>et</strong> al., 2010) and calculated for each of all five major dairy productions regions<br />

were considered. In addition, annual data on crop production and area harvested were collected at the<br />

state level for each feed component from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and National<br />

Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (USDA NASS, 2010). These param<strong>et</strong>ers were also used to calculate<br />

the correspond<strong>in</strong>g annual yields of production.<br />

Eleven ma<strong>in</strong> feed components were considered <strong>in</strong> the ration, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

commodity crops that are traded and shipped on national scale mark<strong>et</strong>s are assumed to be produced<br />

<strong>in</strong> any state<br />

domestic crops such as light forage and haylage are assumed to be produced with<strong>in</strong> a region (out<br />

of the five def<strong>in</strong>ed regions) where the farm is located<br />

pasture and local crops that are heavy or not transportable feed are assumed to be grown locally<br />

on-farm<br />

Table 1 shows the different feed supply mix models that were assumed for a spatial impact assessment related<br />

to feed production.<br />

Table 1. Supply mix models for each feed components<br />

Supply mix models Feed components<br />

National, based on <strong>in</strong>ter stated transport data DDGS dry<br />

DDGS w<strong>et</strong><br />

Corn gra<strong>in</strong><br />

Soybean<br />

Soybean meal<br />

State Alfalfa silage<br />

Corn silage<br />

Grass pasture<br />

Grass silage<br />

Regional Alfalfa hay<br />

Grass hay<br />

2.2. Life Cycle Impact Assessment<br />

From a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) perspective, the m<strong>et</strong>hod used is built upon recommendations<br />

of previously published works as well as the framework and the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples established by the UNEP/SETAC<br />

Life Cycle Initiative Task Force on Land Use LCIA phase 1 (Milà i Canals <strong>et</strong> al., 2007) and phase 2 (LUL-<br />

CIA, 2008-<strong>2012</strong>). Unlike traditional categories that assess impacts of emissions, land use impact characterisation<br />

is not structured accord<strong>in</strong>g to the conventional steps of fate, exposure and effect, nor is it based on<br />

mass and energy balance. Rather, the assessment stems from the change <strong>in</strong> environmental quality (EQ) <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

by land use over time (Fig. 1).<br />

316<br />

Figure 1. Environmental quality curve (adapted from Milà i Canals <strong>et</strong> al., (2007), Saad <strong>et</strong> al., (2011))

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!