28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUP 5, SESSION B: FOOD PRODUCTS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

145. Track<strong>in</strong>g environmental impact of food production cha<strong>in</strong>: a case<br />

study on fresh carrot cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Italy<br />

Simona Bosco 1,* , Giorgio Ragagl<strong>in</strong>i 1 , Giuseppe Garcea 2 , Roberta De Natale 3 , Enrico Bonari 1<br />

1 Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy, 2 CCPB Srl, Bologna, Italy, 3 Auchan<br />

SpA, Rozzano Milanofiori, Italy, Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author. E-mail: s.bosco@sssup.it<br />

It is recognised that food product supply cha<strong>in</strong>s contribute to the environmental impact of goods production<br />

and consumption. In the last years, an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of food cha<strong>in</strong> partners and public authorities have<br />

promoted many <strong>in</strong>itiatives to provide <strong>in</strong>formation about the environmental performance of food products<br />

(Peacock <strong>et</strong> al., 2011), with an <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terest focused only on the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t analysis (Hillier <strong>et</strong> al.,<br />

2009; BSI 2011). Adoption of differences approaches, m<strong>et</strong>hodologies and objectives could confuse consumers<br />

and stakeholders, while scientifically defensible <strong>in</strong>formation concern<strong>in</strong>g food production and food product<br />

and production systems are required by policymaker and producers (Schau and F<strong>et</strong> 2008).<br />

Here we proposed a new m<strong>et</strong>hod specific for food products and production cha<strong>in</strong>s eco-labell<strong>in</strong>g based on<br />

LCI built on modular phases <strong>in</strong>tegrated with<strong>in</strong> questionnaires. The food cha<strong>in</strong> system boundary was def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

so as to <strong>in</strong>clude four ma<strong>in</strong> phase: agricultural phase, process<strong>in</strong>g and packag<strong>in</strong>g, delivery to platform and to<br />

r<strong>et</strong>ail store. Consumer phase was not <strong>in</strong>cluded, except for waste management. The LCI considered all the<br />

<strong>in</strong>puts, both energy and material, <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the production process, and the outputs for each phase of the<br />

food cha<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all transports until the supermark<strong>et</strong>. Special attention was devoted to the agricultural<br />

phase, for all field operations data were tracked <strong>in</strong> a field trial notebook and all the direct field emissions<br />

were <strong>in</strong>cluded. This m<strong>et</strong>hod was applied to a complex food product cha<strong>in</strong> of a large-scale r<strong>et</strong>ail trade company.<br />

The exam<strong>in</strong>ed production was fresh carrot with<strong>in</strong> a real case study <strong>in</strong> Italy, us<strong>in</strong>g an approach similar<br />

to that of food traceability. 1 kg fresh carrot packed <strong>in</strong> a plastic tray was chosen as functional unit (FU), and<br />

the production cha<strong>in</strong> was organised <strong>in</strong> farm production, process<strong>in</strong>g and packag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Abruzzo Region, delivery<br />

to distribution platform <strong>in</strong> Lombardy Region and to one s<strong>in</strong>gle r<strong>et</strong>ail store located <strong>in</strong> the same region<br />

(Fig. 1). The data collection was referred to 2009; primary data were collected by questionnaires, filled out<br />

by farmers or technicians responsible of each phase. Secondary data were from GaBi embedded database and<br />

literature (GaBi, <strong>2012</strong>). CML 2001 m<strong>et</strong>hod was used for impact assessment for seven ma<strong>in</strong> impact categories<br />

(IC): Global Warm<strong>in</strong>g (GWP), Acidification (AP), Eutrophication (EP), Freshwater Aquatic Ecotoxicity<br />

(FAETP), Terrestric Ecotoxicity (TETP), Photochem. Ozone Creation (POCP), Human Toxicity (HTP).<br />

Results presented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2 show that packag<strong>in</strong>g and stor<strong>in</strong>g phases were responsible of the largest impact<br />

level <strong>in</strong> each considered ICs, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the estimated electricity consumption for refrigeration. It is important<br />

to notice that also the distribution at platform, rarely <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the literature, could significantly<br />

affect the results <strong>in</strong> some IC, 33% <strong>in</strong> FAETP and 27.5% <strong>in</strong> HTP. On the contrary, the cultivation phase<br />

showed low impact levels <strong>in</strong> average, with exception for EP, where it was responsible for the 39% of the<br />

estimated impact. The proposed approach was able to describe and analyse the impact of a real food production<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>. The questionnaires allowed build<strong>in</strong>g a simple and clear m<strong>et</strong>hod for a d<strong>et</strong>ailed data collection. This<br />

approach helped to develop a standardised system boundary for food products and subsequently to carry out<br />

robust and easily comparable <strong>LCA</strong> analyses.<br />

References<br />

BSI, 2011 PAS 2050:2011 - Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of<br />

goods and services. BSI British Standards, London.<br />

GaBi, <strong>2012</strong>. GaBi software. http://gabi-software.com<br />

Hillier, J., Hawes, C., Squire, G., Hilton, A., Wale, S., Smith, P., 2009. The carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>ts of food crop<br />

production. Int J Agric Susta<strong>in</strong>, 7(2), 107-118.<br />

Peacock, N., Camillis, C., Penn<strong>in</strong>gton, D., Aich<strong>in</strong>ger, H., Parenti, A., Rennaud, J.-P., <strong>et</strong> al., 2011. Towards a<br />

harmonised framework m<strong>et</strong>hodology for the environmental assessment of food and dr<strong>in</strong>k products. Int J<br />

Life Cycle Ass, 16(3), 189-197.<br />

Schau, E. M., F<strong>et</strong>, A. M. 2008. <strong>LCA</strong> Studies of <strong>Food</strong> Products as Background for Environmental Product<br />

Declarations Int J Life Cycle Ass, 13, 255-264.<br />

875

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!