28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARALLEL SESSION 7B: BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

teen female calves after wean<strong>in</strong>g not selected for replacement were fattened (until 650 kg LW) with a di<strong>et</strong><br />

based on maize silage, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an ADG of 1.15 kg.<br />

Scenario S4 evaluated effects of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g longevity of cows from 7 to 9 years to provide a mean of 6.5<br />

calves per lif<strong>et</strong>ime <strong>in</strong>stead of 4.4 calves. As a consequence, the number of culled cows decreased (from 16 to<br />

13), and the number of heifers used for meat production <strong>in</strong>creased (from 14 to 17).<br />

Scenario S5 evaluated effects of decreas<strong>in</strong>g first calv<strong>in</strong>g age from 3 to 2 years simulated based on Farrié <strong>et</strong><br />

al., (2008). All female calves were reared to reach 467 kg LW (<strong>in</strong>stead of 405 kg) at 15 months for the first<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g. Heifers not used for replacement at 15 months were fattened to slaughter at 23 months (about 670<br />

kg LW) <strong>in</strong>stead of 33 months (at 698 kg LW). Replacement rate was slightly lower (21.4%) than <strong>in</strong> the basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(23%) scenario; although these cows produced more calves (mean = 4.7 <strong>in</strong>stead of 4.4) per lif<strong>et</strong>ime, they<br />

were culled sooner (at 6 years and 780 kg LW <strong>in</strong>stead of at 7 years and 800 kg LW).<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g practices (S6-S8)<br />

Scenario S6 evaluated the effects of replac<strong>in</strong>g some prote<strong>in</strong> supplement with lucerne hay dur<strong>in</strong>g the w<strong>in</strong>ter.<br />

A portion of temporary grassland was used to produce lucerne hay, and the prote<strong>in</strong> supplement was decreased<br />

from 6.8 to 2.3 t. Lucerne hay contributed 12.4% of the total hay production.<br />

Scenario S7 evaluated effects of us<strong>in</strong>g rapeseed meal to replace soybean meal <strong>in</strong> the bull di<strong>et</strong>.<br />

Extruded l<strong>in</strong>seed was used <strong>in</strong> scenario S8 to replace a portion of concentrate (cereals and prote<strong>in</strong> supplement)<br />

<strong>in</strong> the cow-calf herd. Lipid content <strong>in</strong> di<strong>et</strong>s for animals was not to exceed 3% DM. Male calves were<br />

sent to the bull-fatten<strong>in</strong>g herd after wean<strong>in</strong>g (350 kg LW) and were fed with concentrate-based di<strong>et</strong> rich <strong>in</strong><br />

lipids (13% barley straw and 83% concentrate <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 46% cereals and 6% extruded l<strong>in</strong>seed) result<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

ADG of 1.71 kg.<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong>ation of scenarios S1, S2, S4, S5 and S7 (S9)<br />

This scenario (S9) is the addition of five scenarios, which were compatible, and of which effects are expected<br />

to be additive: decrease <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral-N fertiliser (S1), <strong>in</strong> grass losses on pasture (S2), <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> cow<br />

longevity (S4), decrease <strong>in</strong> age at first calv<strong>in</strong>g (S5) and replacement of soybean meal with rapeseed meal<br />

(S7).<br />

2.3. Alternative land use: fast-grow<strong>in</strong>g conifer even-aged forest<br />

An alternative land-use option was explored to reduce GHG emissions of the farm system. If farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices reduced permanent grassland occupation per kg of carcass mass, this land area released due to more<br />

efficient farm<strong>in</strong>g practices was converted to a conifer even-aged forest, which is more attractive to farmers<br />

than deciduous hard-wood species, due to its faster growth. Corsican p<strong>in</strong>e was chosen because it is well<br />

adapted even on poor sites, provides good wood quality and has been successful <strong>in</strong> several French regions. It<br />

further may enhance on-farm biodiversity. We assumed a 64-year rotation, dur<strong>in</strong>g which the forest sequesters<br />

11.4 t CO2/ha/yr <strong>in</strong>to the veg<strong>et</strong>ation (Vall<strong>et</strong> <strong>et</strong> al., 2009). The ma<strong>in</strong> function of the forest with<strong>in</strong> the beeffarm<br />

system be<strong>in</strong>g C sequestration, we did not <strong>in</strong>clude the harvest of the trees (which would occur 64 years<br />

after plant<strong>in</strong>g), neither concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts required nor with respect to the products it would yield. We did<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>puts required for the plantation of the forest and its management dur<strong>in</strong>g the establishment phase.<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

3.1. Effects of farm<strong>in</strong>g practices on CC, CC/LULUC, CED, EP and AC<br />

Grassland management (S1-S2)<br />

Decreas<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>eral N-fertiliser application to permanent grassland (S1) slightly decreased impacts of the<br />

whole system (reduction b<strong>et</strong>ween 1 and 2%), except for CED and EP (by 2.9 and 10.5%, Table 1), because<br />

its use was already low <strong>in</strong> the basel<strong>in</strong>e. It can, however, reduce production costs.<br />

Decreas<strong>in</strong>g grass loss on pasture (S2) did not affect CC/LULUC (reduction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!