28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUP 2, SESSION A: CARBON OR WATER FOOTPRINTS, SOIL, BIODIVERSITY 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

47. Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of the Australian dairy <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Sven Lundie 1 , Jake McLaren 2,* , Neil van Buuren 3 , Sebastian Gollnow 1,2 , Andrew Moore 2 , Larisa Maya<br />

Altamira 2 , Daniel Thylmann 1 , Barbara Nebel 2 , Hazel v. Rowley 4 , Manfred Lenzen 5 , Karen Christie 6 , Torsten<br />

Rehl 1 , Sab<strong>in</strong>e Deiml<strong>in</strong>g 1<br />

1 PE International AG, Stuttgart, Germany, 2 PE Australasia Ltd., Well<strong>in</strong>gton, New Zealand, 3 Dairy Australia,<br />

Melbourne, Australia, 4 Susta<strong>in</strong>ability Assessment Program, Water Research Centre, The University of New<br />

South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 5 Integated Susta<strong>in</strong>ability Assessment Group, University of Sydney, Australia,<br />

6 Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, Correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

author. E-mail j.mclaren@pe-<strong>in</strong>ternational.com<br />

This abstract describes an overview of a carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t project conducted (2010-12) by PE International,<br />

PE Australasia and a consortium of research partners. The project sponsor is Dairy Australia act<strong>in</strong>g on behalf<br />

of the Australian national dairy <strong>in</strong>dustry. This abstract outl<strong>in</strong>es the project aims, m<strong>et</strong>hodology, approach<br />

adopted and lessons learnt.<br />

Overall the study aims to assist Australian dairy companies to understand the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of their products,<br />

and develop long term strategies to reduce hot spots <strong>in</strong> the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of dairy products. The overarch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

project aims are to:<br />

Quantify the carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t of the major Australian dairy products produced for export, i.e. butter,<br />

cheese, fresh products, milk powders, nutritional and UHT-products, whey and lactose, from farmto-distributor’s<br />

warehouse or export harbour. Altog<strong>et</strong>her, 12 products have been <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />

Represent the weighted Australian average product carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t for selected products based on<br />

annual production figures by region and by farm practices;<br />

Establish an auditable monitor<strong>in</strong>g system and framework for a reproducible carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that can be updated and expanded to <strong>in</strong>clude other environmental impacts <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />

Me<strong>et</strong><strong>in</strong>g the goals of the project requires collection of primary <strong>LCA</strong> data from approximately 150 farms and<br />

and 15 dairy representative process<strong>in</strong>g sites across Australia operated by the major dairy companies.<br />

The m<strong>et</strong>hodology for this study is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with ISO standards on Life Cycle Assessment and the sector specific<br />

Carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es of the International Dairy Federation (2010). Follow<strong>in</strong>g the IDF guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

(IDF, 2010) raw milk <strong>in</strong>take and transportation is allocated on the basis of the milk solids content of the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al product. Operations with<strong>in</strong> the process<strong>in</strong>g plant are modelled as d<strong>et</strong>ailed as the data availability allow.<br />

Three modell<strong>in</strong>g and approaches are possible for address<strong>in</strong>g allocation issues at the process<strong>in</strong>g plants.<br />

The study <strong>in</strong>cludes all relevant activities from the grow<strong>in</strong>g of grass on farm to feed the cows, to the delivery<br />

of dairy products to warehouse or export harbour. On farm site this <strong>in</strong>cludes emissions from mechanical as<br />

well as non-mechanical sources. For the product process<strong>in</strong>g the system boundary conta<strong>in</strong>s all relevant activities<br />

from collection of the milk from the farm, product process<strong>in</strong>g, through to export harbours for export<br />

products, and for fresh products to the r<strong>et</strong>ailers’ distribution warehouse.<br />

The scale of data collection and complexity of modell<strong>in</strong>g approach for this project is extensive. The software<br />

solution utilised is a l<strong>in</strong>ked solution, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g both GaBi and SoFi software packages from PE International<br />

(Fig. 1). Data was collected us<strong>in</strong>g customised web-based questionnaires <strong>in</strong> the SoFi software which<br />

allow <strong>in</strong>dividual producers to submit their data <strong>in</strong> a secure and auditable environment.<br />

References<br />

International Dairy Federation (2010) “A common carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t m<strong>et</strong>hodology for the dairy sector”, November<br />

2010<br />

723

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!