28.12.2012 Views

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

LCA Food 2012 in Saint Malo, France! - Manifestations et colloques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PARALLEL SESSION 4C: CROP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS 8 th Int. Conference on <strong>LCA</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Agri-<strong>Food</strong> Sector, 1-4 Oct <strong>2012</strong><br />

Table 1. Characteristics of the 12 selected field representative for aga<strong>in</strong>st the season tomato <strong>in</strong> Ben<strong>in</strong><br />

Field<br />

codes<br />

414<br />

Geo<br />

Loc<br />

Irr syst<br />

Field<br />

area (m²)<br />

Duration<br />

(days)<br />

Yield<br />

(kg.ha -1 )<br />

Nitrogen<br />

rate (kg.ha -1 )<br />

Number of<br />

pesticide appli-<br />

cations<br />

Water supplied<br />

(m 3 .ha -1 )<br />

P06 Cot Man 306 118 4902 2684 29 7200 Sand<br />

P07 Cot Man 126 104 12452 2807 4 6360 Sand<br />

P10 Cot Spr<strong>in</strong>k. 196 104 0 905 10 2665 Sand<br />

P12 Cot Man 546 111 7875 755 17 10400 Silt<br />

P28 Pa Man 922 110 8 1328 7 586 Silt<br />

P17 Pa Hose 169 102 127 665 5 4515 Sand<br />

P19 Pa Hose 1915 56 0 1389 12 919 Silt<br />

P38 Pa Hose 895 88 10 72 11 3759 Sand<br />

P39 Pa Hose 760 103 5662 507 17 10581 Sand<br />

P33 GPP Hose 2200 104 4498 2258 10 771 Clay<br />

P37 GPP Hose 576 113 21163 1595 5 5318 Sand<br />

P40 GPP Hose 963 113 1703 60 1 7048 Sand<br />

2.2. Life-cycle assessment m<strong>et</strong>hodology<br />

An ISO-compliant <strong>LCA</strong> was performed to compare the environmental impact of the 12 fields selected.<br />

The functional unit assigned for all fields was one hectare of tomato production <strong>in</strong> agreement with the farmers’<br />

strategy to give value to an area through the production of a commercial product. The fields were assessed<br />

from-cradle-to-field-gate. Input production and <strong>in</strong>frastructures were <strong>in</strong>cluded, while transport and<br />

end-of-life were not taken <strong>in</strong>to account. Data on the production of agricultural <strong>in</strong>puts was taken from the<br />

Eco<strong>in</strong>vent database (v2.2). Field emissions were estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the best available m<strong>et</strong>hods for such a specific<br />

context. Ammonia (NH3) emissions follow<strong>in</strong>g the application of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertiliser nitrogen were estimated<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g emission factors from the ECETOC report (ECETOC 1994). Emission factors of group I (high<br />

NH3 emission potential due to high temperature and pH) were chosen to be representative as much as possible<br />

for the tropical context with high temperatures. For volatilisation from poultry manure, a 20% emission<br />

factor was selected from the Eco<strong>in</strong>vent guidel<strong>in</strong>es (Nemecek and Kägi 2007). The nitrogen content of poultry<br />

manure was s<strong>et</strong> to 3% accord<strong>in</strong>g to the organic fertilisation guide of the Reunion Island (Chabalier <strong>et</strong> al.,<br />

2006) taken as representative for a tropical context. The emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide<br />

(NOx) were estimated follow<strong>in</strong>g the Tier 1 m<strong>et</strong>hodology of the IPCC guidel<strong>in</strong>es (IPCC 2006) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both<br />

direct and <strong>in</strong>direct emissions. Due to the lack of a suitable m<strong>et</strong>hod for horticultural crops <strong>in</strong> the Tropics, we<br />

estimated nitrate leach<strong>in</strong>g as 30% of total N applied (IPCC, 2006). Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), phosphorus,<br />

and pesticides were estimated follow<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>et</strong>hods from Nemecek and Kägi (2007). The SimaPro<br />

(v7.2) software was used to analyse the environmental impact through the 13 impact categories def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

ReCiPe (Goedkoop <strong>et</strong> al., 2009). The names and units of the impact categories are given <strong>in</strong> Table 2.<br />

2.3. Two-step statistical analysis<br />

To describe the diversity of environmental impacts for the studied cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems, we used a two-step<br />

statistical treatment. The first step was to transform the impacts categories <strong>in</strong>to non-correlated variables with<br />

a Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Component Analysis (PCA). The number of variables was reduced <strong>in</strong>to less dimensions representative<br />

for most of the variability observed <strong>in</strong> the population. Once <strong>in</strong>dividual fields were spread on this multidimensional<br />

space, the PCA m<strong>et</strong>hod allowed identify<strong>in</strong>g one most representative field located closest to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tersection of the dimensions and, fields responsible for the variability located at the edge of the cloud.<br />

Fields were then grouped <strong>in</strong>to clusters correspond<strong>in</strong>g to cropp<strong>in</strong>g system types us<strong>in</strong>g an Agglomerative Hierarchical<br />

Cluster<strong>in</strong>g (AHC) algorithm, <strong>in</strong> which the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal components of the PCA were used as <strong>in</strong>put variables.<br />

As PCA allows the calculation of one representative field for the whole population, AHC allows identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

one representative field (called paragon) for each cluster (or type). These paragons are located near<br />

the centroid of each cluster. The population can therefore be analysed us<strong>in</strong>g those typical <strong>in</strong>dividuals, avoid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

any aggregation or averag<strong>in</strong>g often lead<strong>in</strong>g to discrepancies with the reality and the system logic of the<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g system. Such a two-step statistical treatment is also called a goal-oriented typology and has been<br />

used <strong>in</strong> studies from the agronomic discipl<strong>in</strong>e to analyse the diversity of cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems and farms<br />

(Pouss<strong>in</strong> <strong>et</strong> al., 2008). Our analysis was strengthened through the test<strong>in</strong>g of the distribution of additional<br />

qualitative or quantitative variables (geographical, irrigation system, soil types or cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems components)<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g Kuiper’s test aga<strong>in</strong>st dimensions and clusters. These variables are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />

Soil<br />

type

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!