Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Comparison</strong> <strong>between</strong> U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>International</strong> Financial Reporting St<strong>and</strong>ards 108<br />
IFRS<br />
U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong><br />
applies to all subsidiaries. Therefore, potential differences<br />
could occur in situations in which<br />
• A subsidiary is not a business or nonprofit activity<br />
• A subsidiary is involved in the sale of in substance<br />
real estate or the conveyance of oil <strong>and</strong> gas mineral<br />
rights<br />
That IFRS guidance also does not address whether it<br />
applies to transactions with nonsubsidiaries that are<br />
businesses or nonprofit activities.<br />
See (ASC 810-10-40-3A through 40-5).<br />
8.3 Special purpose entities/variable interest entities<br />
IFRS<br />
Relevant guidance: SIC-12<br />
U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong><br />
Relevant guidance: ASC 810-10 “Variable Interest<br />
Entities” subsections<br />
Introduction<br />
IAS 27 requires a parent to consolidate all entities that it<br />
controls. However, it does not provide explicit guidance<br />
on the consolidation of special purpose entities (SPEs).<br />
That guidance is in SIC-12.<br />
According to SIC 12, an SPE is an entity created to<br />
accomplish a narrow <strong>and</strong> well-defined purpose. It may<br />
take the form of a corporation, trust, partnership, or<br />
unincorporated entity. The legal arrangements<br />
governing SPEs often impose strict limits on the<br />
decision-making powers of the governing body over the<br />
operations of the SPE. These provisions may specify<br />
that policies cannot be modified other than by the<br />
entity's creator or sponsor (for example, they operate on<br />
“autopilot”) (SIC 12.1).<br />
ASC 810-10 requires a parent to consolidate all entities in<br />
which it has a controlling financial interest unless control<br />
does not rest with the majority owner. The usual condition<br />
for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a<br />
majority voting interest (voting interest model). However,<br />
majority ownership in some entities does not convey a<br />
controlling financial interest. For such entities, called<br />
variable interest entities (VIEs), the guidance in<br />
ASC 810-10, “Variable Interest Entities” subsections shall<br />
be applied to determine if a reporting entity’s variable<br />
interests give it a controlling financial interest in the VIE.<br />
A reporting entity that holds a direct or indirect (explicit or<br />
implicit) variable interest in a legal entity must determine<br />
whether the guidance in the “Variable Interest Entities”<br />
subsections of ASC 810-10 applies to that legal entity<br />
before considering other consolidation guidance.<br />
However, the recognition <strong>and</strong> measurement provisions in<br />
ASC 810-10 are indefinitely deferred for certain<br />
investment funds (ASC 810-10-65-2).<br />
Under the amended guidance in ASC 810-10, “Variable<br />
Interest Entities” subsections, a legal entity is a variable<br />
interest entity (VIE) if any of the following conditions<br />
exists:<br />
• The total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to<br />
allow it to finance its activities without additional<br />
subordinated financial support<br />
• The legal entity’s total equity investment at risk does<br />
not provide its holders, as a group, with all of the<br />
© 2011 <strong>Grant</strong> <strong>Thornton</strong> LLP<br />
All rights reserved<br />
U.S. member firm of <strong>Grant</strong> <strong>Thornton</strong> <strong>International</strong> Ltd