Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Comparison</strong> <strong>between</strong> U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>International</strong> Financial Reporting St<strong>and</strong>ards 33<br />
IFRS<br />
should be presented separately from other assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities (both as separate single lines).<br />
The assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities should not be offset in the statement of financial position (IFRS 5.38).<br />
The major classes of assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities classified as held for sale shall be separately disclosed<br />
either in the statement of financial position or in the notes (there is an exemption from this<br />
additional disclosure in cases where the disposal group is a newly acquired subsidiary). An entity<br />
shall present separately any cumulative income or expense recognised in other comprehensive<br />
income relating to a non-current asset (disposal group) classified as held for sale<br />
(IFRS 5.38-.39).<br />
U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong><br />
except that U.S.<br />
<strong>GAAP</strong> does not<br />
have a similar<br />
disclosure<br />
exemption for a<br />
newly acquired<br />
subsidiary (ASC<br />
205-20-45-10).<br />
© 2011 <strong>Grant</strong> <strong>Thornton</strong> LLP<br />
All rights reserved<br />
U.S. member firm of <strong>Grant</strong> <strong>Thornton</strong> <strong>International</strong> Ltd