Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Comparison between U.S. GAAP and International ... - Grant Thornton
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Comparison</strong> <strong>between</strong> U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>International</strong> Financial Reporting St<strong>and</strong>ards 76<br />
IFRS<br />
award credits shall be measured by reference to their<br />
fair value (IFRIC 13.6).<br />
Note: Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010<br />
amends the Appendix to IFRIC 13 to clarify the fair value<br />
of award credits. The amendment is effective for annual<br />
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011.<br />
The consideration allocated to the award credits shall be<br />
recognised as follows:<br />
• If the entity supplies the award, revenue shall be<br />
recognised when the credits are redeemed <strong>and</strong> the<br />
entity fulfills its obligations to supply awards<br />
(IFRIC 13.7)<br />
• If a third party supplies the award, the entity shall<br />
evaluate whether it is collecting the award credits as<br />
the principal or agent in the transaction<br />
U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong><br />
some companies apply that guidance by analogy <strong>and</strong><br />
allocate revenue to the award credits. Others may follow<br />
an incremental cost approach in which the cost<br />
associated with the award credit is accrued.<br />
<br />
<br />
If the entity is acting as an agent in the<br />
transaction, revenue shall be measured at the<br />
net amount <strong>and</strong> recognised when the third<br />
party becomes obliged to supply the awards<br />
<strong>and</strong> entitled to receive consideration<br />
If the entity is acting as the principal in the<br />
transaction, revenue shall be measured gross<br />
<strong>and</strong> recognised when it fulfills its obligations for<br />
the awards (IFRIC 13.8)<br />
6.1a Revenue - long-term contracts/construction contracts<br />
IFRS<br />
U.S. <strong>GAAP</strong><br />
Relevant guidance: IAS 11; IFRIC 15 Relevant guidance: ASC 605-35<br />
Introduction<br />
IAS 11 applies to the accounting for fixed-price <strong>and</strong> costplus<br />
construction contracts for a single asset (such as a<br />
building, bridge, ship, or tunnel) or combination of related<br />
assets (such as the construction of refineries <strong>and</strong> other<br />
complex pieces of plant or equipment) in the financial<br />
statements of contractors (IAS 11.1-.6).<br />
A construction contract is defined as “a contract<br />
specifically negotiated for the construction of an asset or<br />
a combination of assets that are closely interrelated or<br />
interdependent in terms of their design, technology <strong>and</strong><br />
function or their ultimate purpose or use.” (IAS 11.3)<br />
According to IAS 11:<br />
• If the outcome of a construction contract can be<br />
As noted in Section 6.1 above, revenue recognition<br />
guidance is included in ASC 605 <strong>and</strong> other topics in the<br />
Codification, as well as SEC guidance. Industry specific<br />
guidance, such as for real estate, is included in other<br />
ASC topics.<br />
ASC 605-35 applies to accounting for performance<br />
contracts where a customer provides specifications for<br />
the construction of a facility, production of goods, or<br />
provision of services. Guidance is not limited to<br />
construction-type contracts<br />
(ASC 605-35-15-2 through 15-6).<br />
According to ASC 605-35:<br />
• Percentage-of-completion is the preferred method<br />
© 2011 <strong>Grant</strong> <strong>Thornton</strong> LLP<br />
All rights reserved<br />
U.S. member firm of <strong>Grant</strong> <strong>Thornton</strong> <strong>International</strong> Ltd