19.01.2015 Views

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />

Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />

and the new Hemispheric Plan for FMD (GIEFA) created in March 2004. GIEFA was created in the inter-<br />

American context 104 to deal with the few pockets of resisting FMD on the continent. The objective of<br />

GIEFA is to eradicate FMD from the Americas by 2010 through control and elimination of the disease<br />

from endemic areas and by protecting FMD free areas. To this end, in 2005 the GIEFA developed an<br />

Action Plan, which is to be complemented by national plans.<br />

One of the basic strategies of the new plan is to strengthen the infrastructure of national veterinary<br />

services. It appears that the previous programme (the PHEFA) contributed significantly to the<br />

improvements of veterinary services in almost all countries of the region, including Argentina.<br />

5.1.2. Cost of prevention and control systems<br />

As discussed above, significant public and private funds have been committed in the South American<br />

region in the context of the national plans. In total, some US$ 3.5 billion have been committed on the fight<br />

against FMD by South American countries during 1990-2004, of which the public sector has contributed<br />

roughly 30% and the private sector 70% (Figure 12). Over 75% of the mass vaccination undertaken by<br />

Argentina and other countries in the region was funded by the private sector (A196).<br />

In 2001, although in the midst of extensive financial difficulties, Argentina’s government assigned a<br />

budget close to US$ 60,000,000 in its latest plan to control FMD (SENASA Resolution 5/2001).<br />

While a regional approach is increasingly being advocated to address FMD, the extent of the financial<br />

commitment on GIEFA is not clear as yet.<br />

5.1.3. Costs of outbreaks<br />

Argentina’s FMD outbreaks have caused significant ripple effects in terms of trade losses in important<br />

export markets. As soon as the “FMD-free with vaccination” status was granted in May 2007, US and<br />

Canadian markets were opened to Argentine fresh beef (further gains were envisaged in Asian countries in<br />

anticipation of a sustained “FMD-free without vaccination” status). Following the FMD outbreak in 2000-<br />

01, the closure of foreign markets reduced export volume by 53% and export value by 65% within the first<br />

eight months of 2001 compared to the previous year. Beef exports fell from US$706 million in 2000 to<br />

US$267 million in 2001 (A260).<br />

Additional losses were <strong>report</strong>ed from lower livestock prices. The dairy industry was also affected because<br />

of reduced productivity per cow and restricted market access.<br />

104 Created by PAHO-WHO (Pan American Health Organisation) and USDA in Houston Conference, with an initial<br />

12 members (6 private and 6 public) and later expanded to include 4 new members (Paraguay, Bolivia, Ecuador and<br />

Venezuela).<br />

Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!