2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting
2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting
2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />
Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />
and the new Hemispheric Plan for FMD (GIEFA) created in March 2004. GIEFA was created in the inter-<br />
American context 104 to deal with the few pockets of resisting FMD on the continent. The objective of<br />
GIEFA is to eradicate FMD from the Americas by 2010 through control and elimination of the disease<br />
from endemic areas and by protecting FMD free areas. To this end, in 2005 the GIEFA developed an<br />
Action Plan, which is to be complemented by national plans.<br />
One of the basic strategies of the new plan is to strengthen the infrastructure of national veterinary<br />
services. It appears that the previous programme (the PHEFA) contributed significantly to the<br />
improvements of veterinary services in almost all countries of the region, including Argentina.<br />
5.1.2. Cost of prevention and control systems<br />
As discussed above, significant public and private funds have been committed in the South American<br />
region in the context of the national plans. In total, some US$ 3.5 billion have been committed on the fight<br />
against FMD by South American countries during 1990-2004, of which the public sector has contributed<br />
roughly 30% and the private sector 70% (Figure 12). Over 75% of the mass vaccination undertaken by<br />
Argentina and other countries in the region was funded by the private sector (A196).<br />
In 2001, although in the midst of extensive financial difficulties, Argentina’s government assigned a<br />
budget close to US$ 60,000,000 in its latest plan to control FMD (SENASA Resolution 5/2001).<br />
While a regional approach is increasingly being advocated to address FMD, the extent of the financial<br />
commitment on GIEFA is not clear as yet.<br />
5.1.3. Costs of outbreaks<br />
Argentina’s FMD outbreaks have caused significant ripple effects in terms of trade losses in important<br />
export markets. As soon as the “FMD-free with vaccination” status was granted in May 2007, US and<br />
Canadian markets were opened to Argentine fresh beef (further gains were envisaged in Asian countries in<br />
anticipation of a sustained “FMD-free without vaccination” status). Following the FMD outbreak in 2000-<br />
01, the closure of foreign markets reduced export volume by 53% and export value by 65% within the first<br />
eight months of 2001 compared to the previous year. Beef exports fell from US$706 million in 2000 to<br />
US$267 million in 2001 (A260).<br />
Additional losses were <strong>report</strong>ed from lower livestock prices. The dairy industry was also affected because<br />
of reduced productivity per cow and restricted market access.<br />
104 Created by PAHO-WHO (Pan American Health Organisation) and USDA in Houston Conference, with an initial<br />
12 members (6 private and 6 public) and later expanded to include 4 new members (Paraguay, Bolivia, Ecuador and<br />
Venezuela).<br />
Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 101