2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting
2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting
2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />
Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />
Other main sources of country data, for countries in Africa and in the other regions, have been the World<br />
Bank APL projects under the Global Program for Avian Influenza (GPAI) 77 and the national plans. As at<br />
present, a total 13 countries have received financing under the APL facility for integrated AHI<br />
preparedness and response projects, the majority of which are currently implemented. In terms of the<br />
national plans, as discussed in section 3.4.3, most countries currently have plans in drafting process. From<br />
a recent review of the countries that responded to the 2006 UNSIC survey (including some 125<br />
developing/transition countries which are members of the OIE) in the majority of cases such plans are in<br />
drafting process (A236b).<br />
Thus, APLs and national plans were obtained for 47 countries in total (in some cases, including Romania<br />
and Vietnam, both documents were available). Overall budgets, main components and budget breakdown<br />
per component are presented in Annex 4.<br />
The following conclusions can be drawn from the analysis of these documents:<br />
• In accordance with the recommendations of the competent organisations (OIE, FAO, WHO, WB),<br />
an increasing number of plans integrate the animal and human health components into a single<br />
strategy and approach. Nonetheless, in a number of cases, plans only deal with the animal health<br />
component. Conversely, some countries have pandemic influenza plans but no animal health plans<br />
as such. The preparation of an integrated plan is an objective of the assistance provided to<br />
countries under the WB APL facility.<br />
• Comparisons between countries are difficult, as national plans tend to differ significantly in terms<br />
of lay out, contents, components, duration (in years) and the level of detail. As indicated above,<br />
this problem was also encountered by the ALIVE analysis of the African country plans.<br />
Furthermore, there is no systematic and uniform independent expert appraisal of the plans at<br />
present, which could be used as a guide to the quality of these documents 78 .<br />
77 The World Bank has two main mechanisms to help countries deal with avian influenza in animals and to prepare<br />
for a possible human flu pandemic. The first of these is a global funding program, formally known as the Global<br />
Program for Avian Influenza (GPAI). A description of the GPAI and an overview of its implementation to July 2006<br />
are provided respectively in A43 and A135. The second mechanism are trust funds, notably the new multidonor<br />
Avian and Human Influenza Facility (AHIF) – which will channel approximately $75 million of the funds committed<br />
by donors at the Beijing Conference on avian flu in January 2006.<br />
78 Some plans have been reviewed/assessed by various bodies (e.g. the FAO, UN Technical Agencies, the WHO, the<br />
WB etc.), these reviews are not done in a systematic or uniform manner. Furthermore, results of these reviews are in<br />
most cases confidential or not readily available. The closest uniform analysis at present is provided in the November<br />
2006 UNSIC survey which provided individual country profiles for the 155 countries that were covered by the<br />
survey (including some 125 developing/transition countries that are members of the OIE). The profiles were done in<br />
a standardised format, following the 6 success factors for AHI plans outlined by UNSIC (strong political<br />
commitment, clear procedures and systems for rapid implementation, attention to improved functioning of VS,<br />
incentives/compensation schemes provided, mobilisation of civil society and private sector, mass communication<br />
campaign), on the basis of information submitted by the countries and additional information collected by UNSIC<br />
agencies.<br />
Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 64