19.01.2015 Views

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />

Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />

Other main sources of country data, for countries in Africa and in the other regions, have been the World<br />

Bank APL projects under the Global Program for Avian Influenza (GPAI) 77 and the national plans. As at<br />

present, a total 13 countries have received financing under the APL facility for integrated AHI<br />

preparedness and response projects, the majority of which are currently implemented. In terms of the<br />

national plans, as discussed in section 3.4.3, most countries currently have plans in drafting process. From<br />

a recent review of the countries that responded to the 2006 UNSIC survey (including some 125<br />

developing/transition countries which are members of the OIE) in the majority of cases such plans are in<br />

drafting process (A236b).<br />

Thus, APLs and national plans were obtained for 47 countries in total (in some cases, including Romania<br />

and Vietnam, both documents were available). Overall budgets, main components and budget breakdown<br />

per component are presented in Annex 4.<br />

The following conclusions can be drawn from the analysis of these documents:<br />

• In accordance with the recommendations of the competent organisations (OIE, FAO, WHO, WB),<br />

an increasing number of plans integrate the animal and human health components into a single<br />

strategy and approach. Nonetheless, in a number of cases, plans only deal with the animal health<br />

component. Conversely, some countries have pandemic influenza plans but no animal health plans<br />

as such. The preparation of an integrated plan is an objective of the assistance provided to<br />

countries under the WB APL facility.<br />

• Comparisons between countries are difficult, as national plans tend to differ significantly in terms<br />

of lay out, contents, components, duration (in years) and the level of detail. As indicated above,<br />

this problem was also encountered by the ALIVE analysis of the African country plans.<br />

Furthermore, there is no systematic and uniform independent expert appraisal of the plans at<br />

present, which could be used as a guide to the quality of these documents 78 .<br />

77 The World Bank has two main mechanisms to help countries deal with avian influenza in animals and to prepare<br />

for a possible human flu pandemic. The first of these is a global funding program, formally known as the Global<br />

Program for Avian Influenza (GPAI). A description of the GPAI and an overview of its implementation to July 2006<br />

are provided respectively in A43 and A135. The second mechanism are trust funds, notably the new multidonor<br />

Avian and Human Influenza Facility (AHIF) – which will channel approximately $75 million of the funds committed<br />

by donors at the Beijing Conference on avian flu in January 2006.<br />

78 Some plans have been reviewed/assessed by various bodies (e.g. the FAO, UN Technical Agencies, the WHO, the<br />

WB etc.), these reviews are not done in a systematic or uniform manner. Furthermore, results of these reviews are in<br />

most cases confidential or not readily available. The closest uniform analysis at present is provided in the November<br />

2006 UNSIC survey which provided individual country profiles for the 155 countries that were covered by the<br />

survey (including some 125 developing/transition countries that are members of the OIE). The profiles were done in<br />

a standardised format, following the 6 success factors for AHI plans outlined by UNSIC (strong political<br />

commitment, clear procedures and systems for rapid implementation, attention to improved functioning of VS,<br />

incentives/compensation schemes provided, mobilisation of civil society and private sector, mass communication<br />

campaign), on the basis of information submitted by the countries and additional information collected by UNSIC<br />

agencies.<br />

Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!