19.01.2015 Views

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />

Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />

4.3.3. Indirect impact<br />

Generally, the available research points out that indirect costs are typically significant multiples of direct<br />

plus consequential on-farm costs and losses, although it should be noted that at the same time the literature<br />

also uniformly stresses the difficulties of measuring the precise extent of these costs (A228, A159, A258,<br />

A292).<br />

Such costs are rarely explored in depth in the available literature, largely due to the methodological<br />

difficulties and constraints of this type of analysis and its extensive data requirements. Assessing the<br />

overall impact of an animal disease on both global meat markets and other sectors along the supply chain<br />

necessitates the use of a framework which links markets, both spatially and cross-commodity. Moreover,<br />

the resulting impact assessment is dependent on the various assumptions underpinning the analysis and<br />

constrained by data limitations. Broadly, a distinction can be made in the available literature between expost<br />

assessments of the actual impact of a disease outbreak that has occurred and ex-ante simulations of<br />

the potential impact of a disease outbreak in the event this occurs. The latter are <strong>part</strong>icularly difficult to<br />

perform, and results are inevitably shaped by the underlying assumptions and scenarios. Great caution<br />

should therefore be paid in the interpretation of the results.<br />

From the experience of developed countries (where literature on the indirect costs of a disease is generally<br />

more advanced), the direct costs – although significant – are usually relatively lower than the considerable<br />

indirect costs caused by the loss of consumer confidence and the impact on export trade. The<br />

overwhelming evidence of the available research suggests that where the response to a disease outbreak<br />

has been rapid and strict control measures have been applied, coupled with an effective communication<br />

campaign towards the wider public, the indirect impacts tend to be more contained.<br />

It is important to note that economic analysis to date has focused on the impacts of ad hoc outbreaks rather<br />

than the long term effects of endemic diseases, in other words of smaller but repeated outbreaks over a<br />

number of years. It has also mostly focused on the domestic impact (within a country or economic zone<br />

e.g. the EU) of an outbreak rather than the global market impact.<br />

However, the international community is increasingly concerned about the global social and economic<br />

impacts of endemic diseases as such. This is <strong>part</strong>ly due to changing times. While many animal diseases,<br />

<strong>part</strong>icularly FMD and most types of AI, have long shown signs of becoming endemic in many <strong>part</strong>s of the<br />

developing world, only since 2001 has the severity of outbreaks of FMD (in Europe and Latin America)<br />

and more recently AI outbreaks in Asia (and moving westward into Europe and Africa) demonstrated that<br />

such events can have a significant impact on international meat markets.<br />

The relative importance of these impacts can be highlighted in the context of the global growth in meat<br />

production and trade of the last 15 years. World meat production has grown from 100 million tonnes in<br />

1990 to nearly 280 million tonnes in 2006. Nearly three quarters of this growth is concentrated in<br />

developing countries, and is accounted for by the pigmeat and poultry sectors. Global meat trade has<br />

grown in similar rates from 8 million tonnes in 1990 to nearly 20 million tonnes by 2006. The value of<br />

meat trade has also increased, but at a lower rate than the volume, indicating the declining trend of meat<br />

prices and the changing meat product composition of trade (much of the growth has been driven by<br />

growing demand for poultry cuts, due to health and economic factors notably the lower prices of poultry<br />

meat relative to other meats). The most significant contributor to the growth in trade has been the poultry<br />

industry (followed by pigmeat), so that the poultry sector’s share of world meat trade has risen from 22%<br />

in 1990 to over 40% in 2005. Consequently, a severe transboundary disease outbreak such as HPAI can<br />

Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!