19.01.2015 Views

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />

Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />

4.2.1.2. Human resources<br />

The availability of competent and well-trained human resources is an important dimension of the<br />

countries’ preparedness to deal with animal diseases. Adequate expertise is essential to disease prevention<br />

and control. According to the 2006 UNSIC survey (A236), the number of trained veterinarians derived<br />

from existing official sources (as <strong>report</strong>ed to the OIE Handistatus II database) varies considerably across<br />

all countries in the various world regions, and disparities between country/regions remain even after<br />

allowing for the size of the sector (in terms of the quantity of meat produced) per region/country (Figure<br />

3).<br />

These data and disparities between regions should be interpreted with caution. Firstly, there are significant<br />

limitations in the data available on veterinary expertise. Secondly, it is difficult to make an objective<br />

comparison of the different veterinary personnel situations in different countries because veterinary<br />

systems and livestock structures / production systems (whether intensive or extensive, backyard or<br />

industrial etc.) vary enormously between countries and these factors influence the optimal number of<br />

required veterinary staff in each case (A80, A81, A92) 48 .<br />

Generally, however, there should be some proportionality between the size of the sector and the number of<br />

veterinarians 49 . In practice, this does not seem to be the case (Figure 3). For example, in the Americas, the<br />

number of veterinarians per country in relation to the size of the sector (expressed in 100,000 tonnes of<br />

meat produced) is 30-35% higher than in Europe, Asia and the Pacific (data for Europe include C. Asia),<br />

over double than in Middle East and North Africa, and 12 times higher than in Africa.<br />

48 There does not appear to be an optimal number of veterinarians as such. Every country has different veterinary<br />

personnel conditions and needs, is at a different stage of development in its Veterinary Services, and employs a<br />

different structure of veterinary staff categories (often mutually overlapping). Therefore, the impracticability of<br />

setting a fixed and uniform international quantitative standard for Veterinary Services is recognised (A80).<br />

49 Literature from the early 1990s (A81), quotes 20,000 Veterinary Livestock Units (VLUs) per veterinarian as the<br />

appropriate ratio for curative and preventative work in the extensive and low-input livestock production systems in<br />

Africa and the Middle East, compared to 2,500 VLUs in the high density and capital intensive production systems<br />

found in Europe. For regions characterised by a combination of extensive and intensive production systems (North<br />

and South America, Asia, Oceania) the average of the two above figures (i.e. 12,500 VLUs) is taken as a standard.<br />

An analysis of 1989 data shows that the Middle east at the time has a surplus of veterinary personnel, while Africa<br />

had a substantial deficit in veterinarians but a surplus in veterinary auxiliaries. (VLU: equivalent to 1 cow or 2 pigs<br />

or 10 small ruminants or 100 fowl).<br />

Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!