19.01.2015 Views

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2294 part 1 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prevention and control of animal diseases worldwide<br />

Part I: Economic analysis: prevention versus outbreak costs<br />

eradication plan’s figures are totals over a 5 year period, and the ALIVE estimates are totals over a 10<br />

year period, while the outbreak costs are quoted as annual amounts. It is also noted that comparisons have<br />

been made only between the public investment components and the total costs. Components of an<br />

effective prevention and control system covered by the private sector, notably investment on biosecurity<br />

which is normally covered by farmers, have not been taken into consideration here. The scale of this<br />

investment is considered to be similar to other smallholder countries with similar poultry farming and<br />

developing country features such as Vietnam, where these were estimated at min US$500-700. This type<br />

of investment is considered prohibitive for the smallholder sector.<br />

The comparison clearly points to the fact that the potential benefits that can accrue from improving<br />

prevention and control are worth several times the investment. It is noted, however, that this relies on the<br />

assumption that a certain investment would result in gains in productivity and export earnings. The extent<br />

to which this will occur will depend on the effective design and implementation of the investment, to<br />

ensure the effective control of the disease. A risk factor will be the re-appearance of the disease, as is often<br />

the case in practice.<br />

The above calculations do not take into account the incremental operational costs involved, which can be a<br />

significant <strong>part</strong> of the cost of strengthening VS.<br />

On the other hand, the investment in strengthening the control of a <strong>part</strong>icular disease, e.g. HPAI, can have<br />

important spill-over benefits on the entire VS.<br />

As in the case of Vietnam, the conclusions drawn at macro-economic level have important implications at<br />

micro-level, for individual farmers and other business relying on the poultry sector, <strong>part</strong>icularly in the<br />

poorer urban and rural <strong>part</strong>s of Nigeria. It is estimates that some 70% of poultry is kept in backyard and<br />

village farming.<br />

Civic <strong>Consulting</strong> • <strong>Agra</strong> <strong>CEAS</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> 128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!