03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

135<br />

Table 4.2<br />

Corruption Risk in Policy Making, Planning, and Budgeting in the Ethiopian Rural Water Supply Sector<br />

Value chain area Typical corrupt practices in water delivery chain Risk areas evaluated by study team in Ethiopia (RWS) Risk ST Risk WS<br />

Policy making and<br />

regulation<br />

Sector-level<br />

planning,<br />

budgeting, and<br />

transfers<br />

• Policy capture (competition and monopolies)<br />

• Regulatory capture (e.g., waivers to<br />

regulations and licensing)<br />

• Distortions in decision making by politicians<br />

(affecting location and types of investments)<br />

• Corruption in national and sector planning<br />

and budget management (misuse of funds,<br />

interministerial bribery for fund allocation,<br />

collusion or bribery in selection and project<br />

approval)<br />

• Corruption in local budget management<br />

(fraud, falsification of accounts or documents)<br />

• Bribery to influence allocation of resources<br />

• Bribery in sector budgeting management<br />

(national and local)<br />

• Donor-government collusion in negotiations<br />

to meet spending or funding targets<br />

• Donor-government collusion or fraud with<br />

respect to progress and quality<br />

Source: Author.<br />

Note: RWS = rural water supply. ST = study team finding. WS = workshop finding.<br />

• Monopoly position of drilling companies (e.g., regional drilling<br />

enterprises in some areas or for some types of work)<br />

• Regulation of design and construction (standards for borehole<br />

design, evidence of overengineering, collusion between<br />

companies)<br />

• Licensing or registration practice and procedure for drilling<br />

companies (bias, selection)<br />

• Distortions in on-budget and off-budget allocations to regions,<br />

zones, and woredas (preferential treatment, political bias)<br />

• Distortions in use of monitoring information (e.g., coverage) for<br />

political or funding ends<br />

• Link between planning and budgeting and the types of<br />

contracts used (do contracts determine the plans?)<br />

• Risk in shift to local-level procurement under decentralization<br />

(e.g., management and oversight of funds, local procurement)<br />

• Donor contribution to corrupt practices, e.g., through collusion<br />

in progress reporting or agreeing to fund moribund projects<br />

Risk<br />

Low<br />

High

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!