03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Corruption in the Mining Sector: Preliminary Overview 391<br />

In the survey, 9 out of 15 respondents thought that corruption in the mining<br />

sector in Ethiopia was much less frequent than in other countries in<br />

Africa, 4 out of 15 thought it was less frequent, and 2 out of 15 thought<br />

it was the same. No one believed that it was more frequent.<br />

In relation to issuing of licenses, the main corruption risks surround<br />

officials who either extort or accept bribes from mining companies to<br />

(a) issue licenses, (b) issue licenses more quickly, or (c) impose lessonerous<br />

license conditions. There is also a risk that officials may secretly<br />

have ownership stakes in companies to which licenses are granted;<br />

acquire land for which a license application has been made; demand a<br />

share in mining companies or in their profits; and manipulate license<br />

registration to give themselves or their associates prior registration. This<br />

latter type of corruption was seen as facilitated by the territorial overlap<br />

between licensing authorities. In the survey, 32 percent of respondents<br />

were aware of corruption in this area—with 32 percent aware of<br />

it at the regional level, 26 percent at the federal level, and 11 percent<br />

at the city level.<br />

In relation to compliance with license conditions, there is a major risk<br />

that nonethical companies might operate without a valid license or deliberately<br />

fail to comply with license conditions and thereafter conceal those<br />

breaches and bribe officials to overlook them. There is also a risk of<br />

inspectors demanding bribes to not report breaches and of officials<br />

requiring mining companies to take actions that will personally benefit<br />

the officials. In the survey, 37 percent of respondents were aware of corruption<br />

in this area—with 37 percent aware of it at the regional level,<br />

32 percent at the federal level, and 11 percent at the city level.<br />

In relation to mining revenues, the main revenue-related corruption<br />

risks concern mining companies that make false declarations about cost,<br />

output, and profits to reduce the royalties and taxes payable to the government<br />

or that bribe government auditors and inspectors to approve the<br />

false declarations. There is also the risk of illegal sale of mining products.<br />

In the survey, 24 percent of respondents were aware of corruption in this<br />

area—with 18 percent aware of it at the federal and city levels, and<br />

12 percent at the regional level.<br />

In relation to compensation and obligations to local inhabitants, officials or<br />

community leaders may steal compensation that should have gone to local<br />

inhabitants; mining companies may bribe officials to set compensation<br />

below a proper rate; and local inhabitants may, to claim compensation,<br />

falsely claim that they occupy land subject to a license application. In the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!