03.06.2015 Views

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

Complete Book PDF (4.12MB) - World Bank eLibrary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Justice Sector Corruption in Ethiopia 221<br />

Table 5.5<br />

Filing of claim and<br />

pretrial stages<br />

Trial and appeal<br />

stages<br />

Enforcement<br />

Source: Author.<br />

Corruption Risks in Civil Justice in Ethiopia’s Justice Sector<br />

Potential forms of corruption<br />

• Public officials (in judiciary or outside) direct staff to admit or not<br />

admit cases.<br />

• Public authorities coerce or bribe private attorneys to file or not file cases.<br />

• Court staff solicit or accept bribes or other consideration to<br />

accept and process claims.<br />

• Lawyers accept bribes from other parties to mishandle cases, or lawyers<br />

accept fees from both parties.<br />

• Lawyers solicit money from clients to bribe judges or staff, but<br />

instead pocket the money.<br />

• Lawyers encourage clients to take cases to court that they are bound<br />

to lose.<br />

• Process servers solicit or accept bribes for nonservice, faster<br />

service, false service, and the like.<br />

• Public officials (in judiciary or outside) direct staff to speed or delay<br />

initial processing of cases.<br />

• Lawyers or parties offer or agree to pay court staff for faster or slower<br />

scheduling of events or for misplacement of case files.<br />

• Public officials (in judiciary or outside) direct judges’ decisions of<br />

pretrial motions.<br />

• Judges solicit or accept bribes for handling of pretrial motions.<br />

• Lawyers file unnecessary motions or appeals to be able to charge<br />

clients more.<br />

• Public officials (in judiciary or outside) direct court staff to misplace files.<br />

• Public officials (in judiciary or outside) direct staff to give them<br />

premature access to judicial decisions.<br />

• Court staff solicit or accept bribes for access to judicial<br />

decisions before they are announced.<br />

• Higher authorities or political elites direct judgments or licenses to<br />

appeal.<br />

• Private attorneys collude with judges for mutual benefit.<br />

• Judges solicit or accept bribes for favorable judgments (or to<br />

higher-level judges on appeal).<br />

• Lawyers or parties engage in jury tampering (if juries are used).<br />

• Court staff use knowledge of judgments to “sell” them to winning<br />

parties.<br />

• Lawyers accept bribes from other parties to mishandle cases.<br />

• Government agency officials ignore judicial orders to pay or take<br />

other action where judgments are against the agency.<br />

• Lawyers or parties negotiate with judges, bailiffs, or other parties so<br />

that enforcement does not occur.<br />

• Court-appointed experts issue under- or overvaluations of assets.<br />

• Court-appointed agents, in public auctions, collude to manipulate<br />

prices, take over assets at reduced prices, or arrange with private<br />

parties to sell for low bid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!